Received a phone call last night from a pollster calling from "The Chronicle Polling Services" and then was guided through one odd political poll....
Unfortunately, I had just arrived home from work and didn't have time to set up the recorder, but I did jot down some notes which I'll relate here....
1st Set of Questions: Standard fare...
"If the election were held today how likely are you to vote."
"Who would you vote for in the Presidential race if the ballot contained: McCain (R), Obama (D), Nadar (I), Barr (L)."
"Who would you vote for in CD7 Congressional race if the ballot contained: Culberson (R), Skelley (D), Drew Parks (L)."
The "Presidential Candidate" question was odd, because (to my knowledge as related
here) Ralph Nadar is not going to appear on the Texas ballot.
2nd Set of Questions: Favorability ratings.
A. Rank the following persons based on how you perceive their job performance on a scale from 1 to 100 (1 being the lowest, 100 being the highest)
1. Henry Paulson
2. President Bush
3. John Culberson
4. Republicans in Congress
B. Which of the following items do you think is the most important issue facing the Government today:
1. Health care
2. The economy and financial markets
3. Illegal immigration
4. Terrorism and National Defense
(there were two others that I didn't write down)
C. How favorable do you rate the following items (Very Favorable, Somewhat Favorable, Somewhat Unfavorable, Very Unfavorable)
1. The recent $700 Billion dollar bailout
2. The War in Iraq
(and a few more...by this time I was scribbling furiously to keep up)
Nothing groundbreaking in this section, but the question asking how I viewed Republicans in Congress, the fact that Paulson was first, AND the omission of how I viewed Democrats in Congress got my radar up.
Then the questions just got odd....
Section 3: CD7 Specific racesIf the election were held today, would you vote for John Culberson (R) or Micheal Skelley (D)?
Ummm...didn't you already ask me that?How much do you know about Michael Skelley?
"I'm now going to read to you a list of things Culberson supporters have been saying about Micheal Skelley, Please state whether or not you are "very concerned", "Somewhat concerned" or "not at all concerned" about these allegations. -
What??? You have GOT to be kidding me?1. Micheal Skelley's business had contracts with Sandanista Rebels.
2. Micheal Skelley will be a "rubber stamp" for Obama, Pelosi and the Democratic leadership in Congress.
3. Micheal Skelley is a big spending liberal who will raise taxes.
4. Micheal Skelley is supported by Mayor White.
"I'm now going to read you Micheal Skelley's responses to the Sandanista issue, please tell me if they are "very effective", "Somewhat effective", "not effective at all" in countering the claims....
1. When Skelley's company did business with the Sandanista's they were operating under a free democratically elected government.
2. The contracts that Skelley's company entered into with the Sandanistas are very similar to contracts signed by the Army Corps of Engineers with the Sandanistas during that time.
3. The United States had lifted the economic and travel embargoes at the time Skelley's company signed the contracts with the Sandanistas.
"I'm now going to read to you some things said about John Culberson, please say if you are "very concerned", "somewhat concerned", "not at all concerned" about these allegations.
1. A statement about John Culberson and pork spending. (over a $Billion according to a Gov't watchdog group)
2. A statement about John Culberson and special interest ties.
(a couple of other fiscal responsibility-type statements)
Sorry, by this time I was terribly behind.Then, the kicker: "Based on the information you have heard in this phone call have you changed your mind regarding who you will vote for in the upcoming eletion?
Then some basic demographic questions....and that was it.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately the number was blocked by caller ID so I'm not even able to provide a company name that made the call other than what the caller stated. At first I thought that this was a 'push' poll by Culberson but when they included some statements questioning his fiscal responsibility I changed my mind. Basically this poll drug BOTH candidates through the mud, and then stood them up to see which one was more clean.
I did find it unusual that there was no question rating the Democrats' performance in Congress, and that Skelley was allowed to have his responses to Culberson's charges included in the poll while Culberson's accusers were allowed to go unchallenged. It wasn't an unbiased poll for sure. There were several statements in the poll about how the $700 billion dollar buyout was to "save the economy and ensure financial security" and language that I would not have included had I designed the poll.
Anyone else in CD7 received this call? If so, what were your thoughts?
One thing is for certain in this race: It's a race. I've had Skelley blockwalkers come by my house twice now and I've received in-person phone calls from the Skelley campaign. Whether you like the guy or not, he's REALLY getting the message out on the streets. Unfortunately for Culberson (in my opinion) he's been relying on robo-calls to announce his "town hall" conference calls and not getting out volunteers to "beat the streets". At least, not in my neighborhood. Until now this race has flown a little bit under the radar in deference to some other high profile races in the area. Culberson's seat has LONG been considered "safe" for the Republicans. I'm hoping some new CD7 polling data comes out soon however, I'm very interested to see where things stand.