Friday, August 29, 2008

Happy Labor Day Y'all.

(Image courtesy of The iPinionsjournal.com)
Yes, there's a lot to blog about, McCain picking Palin (smart pick), Obama and the Democrats, Gustav, etc.

But I'm taking an extended weekend and will be firmly stationed at my backyard grill all weekend with adult beverage in hand.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

The (New) Houston Political Dictionary (Revised) - P

Pachyderms - Perhaps the most endangered species inside the boundries of Loop 610.

Parents - The root of all evil.

Freud was the first modern thinker to place all blame for his shortcomings on his parents, something we now take for granted in every day life. In the 60's parents were viewed as "stiffs" or "straights" and the Baby Boom Generation decided that rebellion was needed. In the 90's parents were told that they were responsible for their kids not doing well in school because they didn't take enough interest in their education. Today parents are told that they are responsible for the poor education system because they are not willing to throw endless amounts of money at programs that are producing diminishing returns.

Park N' Ride - A practical transportation solution thrust into the background by an imminently less practical, more expensive and less effective toy.

Parks - Urban equivilents of the Garden of Eden.

Partisans (See: Puppets, Sock for more)

Pavilions, Houston - Further proof that profit and Government business principles are mutually exclusive terms.

Pecking order - Something rolled out occasionally for the express purpose of reminding others that they are below the subject on it.

Perennial Candidate - See: Bell, Chris.

Person - A political unit of measure.

PeTA - Proof that idiots make the loudest advocates.

Petro Dictators - The funniest phrase from Night two of the Democratic Convention. I have no idea what it means either, but it was too priceless to not include it.

Pi - Numerical shorthand used by bloggers and mathmaticians a few times each year to prove their superiority over those who shun its use.

Pie - An infinitely more practical, tasty and worthwhile use of the sounds "P" and "eye".

Pitiful - Adjective to describe the state of any Government project in operation for a period longer than five years.

Pity - A statement of our joy that certain misfortunes have not fallen on us.

Pizza (American) - Carboard covered with slop.

Pizza (Italian) - Delicious, practical, healthy food first used by workers as carry-along meals.

Podcasts - Verbal (rather than visual) ego-strokes. (see: Blog)

Pole - Public enemy number one.

Since taking office Mayor White has been doggedly targeting sexually oriented businesses (S.O.B.'s) all but painting them as the first sign that the Apocalypse is in Houston. Since he's also stated that he wants a better Houston for "all people" one must assume that the true enemy is "not" the topless dancer, or club owners, but...the pole.

Police - A state that should be avoided at all costs, but to whom even those against them cry first when the bovine excrement hits the environmental oscillator.

Political capital - IOU's held held in trust as payment for a willingness to bend-over politically without lubrication in the past. Skilled politicians have a lot of this.

Politicians - Whores with a campaign fund.

Politics - Prostitution perfected, institutionalized, and dressed up in custom suits.

Pollen - Technically, its dander released from plants that serves an important role in the reproductive process. In reality pollen is the most venemous substance in God's creation.

Polygamy - An ancient form of economic security that's been pushed out of popularity by the rise of feminism.

America has a problem of classifying economic issues in terms of morality, something that no only electrifies the issue, but also obscures its true roots. Polygamy is not, in and of itself, immoral. In ancient times the wealthy were more likely to have several wives, either due to political reasons or because of economics. A rich husband could support more wive's families, so by default he was married more often. The original underlying cause of polygamy wasn't morals, but financials. The same mistake is made today with gay marriage. The overriding principle behind gay marriage isn't love, but finances. Partner's receive benefits, health insurance and other perks from being married that unmarried couples do not. The actual act of love does not change.

Pundit - Increasingly: failed political prostitutes selling their insight on the profession to the highest bidder.

Puppets, Sock - Devotees to any one major political party.

One only needs to tune into the Party Conventions during a major speech to understand the appeal of sock puppets to the major parties. People who are willing to forgo common sense while nodding expactantly, cheering on demand, and waving pre-distributed signs on key are vital to the production values of a good convention. Typically, Democrats do this better than Republicans due to their ability to to suppress self-pride in the hopes they will get on television for just a second or two. The other option are the conventions of old, where actual, real live discussion and debate occured. Something that's been outlawed in todays society.

Putz - An accurate descriptor of several people in public life that's, sadly, gone out of style.

The puppet masters.

I'll admit it, I didn't watch the coronation last night. ESPN2 was running their pre-season College Football special. Priorities.

I typically get my "convention fixes" the next morning, as I read what the sock puppets have to say about what went on.

From the Blue corner:
Looking forward to Joe Biden’s speech, and to the events of tomorrow night. Happy Days may really be here again.


The Red Team:
More of the same is pretty much what Biden spewed. And he can't make Obama into a person with accomplishment or ready to be President.



Pull the string, puppet repeats mantra. Repeat.


Sock puppetry is what the two major Political parties rely on however, so it shouldn't be discounted as a major part of American political philosophy. For most people, the parties do the thinking for you. They set forth the platform, define the issues, break everything down into a simple "blue/red" dichotomy so deep thought isn't required. In other words they promise to handle the nasty bits of the world so You, dear voter, can go about your daily life working and spending, spending and working.

Oh yeah? Did we mention spending?

Because these conventions with their huge electronic scoreboards and state of the art light shows cost a fortune. As a matter of fact, there's enough money donated to BOTH political parties every year to feed and house a small Country, or the poor in America.

I'm talking about money that's freely given, money that partisans glady fork over before they go to the ballot box so that they can then say they have the right to gripe about us and what we're not giving to charity. Think about it: we're paying people money to head to Washington D.C. and then turn around and tell us what to do, how much of our money they're going to take, and then what we should want our money spent on.

That's why sock puppetry is the ultimate political skill. Can you, as a candidate, get enough people to forgo any semblance of common sense and give you large amounts of money and then be willing to fall into lockstep behind issues that lobbyists pay you even more money to "support".

Convention politics: Pull the string: "Yes we can!" "Happy Days Are Here Again".

Sock Puppets.


I'll throw my support behind the first party that forgoes their convention and donates the money to charitable groups in the host city that are working to feed and house the poor. THAT's my kind of political action committee.

Repetitive writing (part III)

The key to fixing health care is through increased Government spending and regulation.


And, a rare break in form:

The way to stop College hazing is to talk to your kids...

She must have been sick that day.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

College Football. Week 1

Here....we.....a.go...


Pick 'em:

Of Local Interest...

1. Southern University @ Houston. - Southern was ranked in the top 20 last year in the Football championship subdivision Division 1-AA, has a good coach, good players returning (including their starting QB) and should have plenty of fans there. UH has a new coach, questions at RB, WR, LB, DB, and DL. Uh-huh, yeah. The first half will be close and then Coach Kevlar will figure out his structural advantage on the line. UH will pound out a workmanlike win.

UH 27 SU 10

2. Southern Methodist @ Rice - June Jones leads the "pure" version of the "Run N' Shoot" offense into Rice Stadium for the first "operation sell-out" of the year. This means that Rice will shoehorn around 10,000 into a stadium that seats over 50,000. That 10,000 will probably see the most exciting football game in Houston this year.

Rice 77 SMU 70


3. Wake Forest(23) @ Baylor - The Art Briles' era in Waco begins with a whimper.

Wake 49 BU 14


4. Florida Atlantic @ Texas(11) - Texas begins their annual charade as a "tough" team. A lie that the burnt orange faithful will buy into up until the Saturday of the Oklahoma game.

Fl ATL 3 Texas (whatever Mack Brown wants it to be) 52

5. Arkansas State @ Texas A&M - And so the Mike Sherman era is underway, in a game that no one other than aTm grads are going to care about outside of Texas and Arkansas.

Arkansas State 10 Texas A&M 35


National Games of note... (not an inclusive list)

1. Va. Tech(17) @ East Carolina (game played in Charlotte) - Upset alert #1. Va Tech is playing this game with over half its travelling squad having ZERO game experience at the College level. Their WR are especially young and the QB is no star in the making. Skip Holtz' Pirates are getting better and better every year.

ECU 24 VT 17

2. USC(3) @ Virginia - Upset Alert #....nah, just kidding. This isn't the same team Virginia, and USC has reloaded nicely. Provided their QB is healthy that is.

USC 38 UVA 13



3. Utah @ Michigan - Of note to me, being a Michigan fan. The Rich Rodriguez era begins with....a thud at the big house. Michigan still has the speed issues on defense that plagued them against spread offenses under Carr, and now they have nothing at QB, a dicey run game, no depth at WR and holes on the OL. Big House becomes the Boo House this year, but in time I believe that CoachRod will right the ship.

Utah 38 Mich 17



4. Appalachian State @ LSU(7) - OK, I don't really think LSU will lose to App State, but it should be a good game of two top programs in their respective divisions. For a half. Then the Tiger's athleticism will take over.

LSU 42 App 20

5. Alabama(24) @ Clemson(9) - An early test will tell us if Clemson is for real, or a pretender (again). I'm prediting they will be for real, or Alabama is overrated this season, I'm not sure which.

Clemson 27 'Bama 17



6. Illinois(20) @ Missouri(6) - Who says there are no good games to start the season? Call this Chase vs. Juice if you must but I'm thinking Mizzou's defense steals the show.

Mizzou 24 Illinois 3



7. Chattanooga @ Oklahoma(4) - The Sooners should move down in the polls if they don't beat Chattanooga by at least 50. The Mocs were 2-9 last year, in the Football Championship Sub-division Div 1-AA. They lost to The Citidel by 25 for Pete's sake. The Sooners should be so far ahead at halftime Stoops could pick fans out of the stands to play defense and still win by double digits.

OU 63 Chatt 3


And, just to get things rolling:

Bad energy reporting in the energy capital of America (Part II)

Two nights, two haphazzard reports: Mean oil company takes 99 year old woman's royalties...

Except that they didn't.....

(from Wendell Edwards of KHOU)
Erma Hall’s oil well pumps and churns near Caldwell in Burleson County.

It’s run by Mineral Technologies out of Midland, but the land it sits on belongs to Hall, who is 99 years old.

She lives on a street that bears her last name in the town of Normagee, about 40 miles from her oil well.

The oil-rich land has been in Hall’s family for some time. In fact, her mother’s name, Amelia Whitfield Washington, is on the lease agreement.

It’s up to folks like Lee Perry to make sure heirs like Hall get their oil royalty payments.

But Hall hasn’t received any money at all.

“Well, the oil company at the time said they didn’t know how to find the relatives of Amelia Whitfield Washington, which is … that’s her mother,” Perry said. “Oil companies, all they have to say is, ‘we don’t know who to pay it to,’ and that’s it.”


Oh the horror!!! Evil, mean greedy oil companies "theiving" the money from an elderly lady.
“It’s like stealing. Oh gracious, any way you put it, it is theft,” Hall’s oldest daughter, Hilda Hall Harrell, said.

This would be a terrible story if reality didn't intervene:
But that’s where the story gets complicated. In a way, the problem is that Erma Hall came from a big family.

Even Mineral Technologies agrees Hall is a rightful heir, but she’s not the only one.

“The current heirs may total more than 40 different individuals of which Ms. Hall allegedly may own as little as 3/84 of the estate’s interest or less. There is, however, disagreement among the heirs that has made it necessary for MTI to turn over the proceeds to the court while the heirs resolve their differences,” the company’s president told 11 News in an e-mail.

Since the lawsuit, the company has put $75,000 in the court registry, and it contributes more money every month.

The money will stay there until all the heirs are found.

“There are some other heirs – nephews and nieces – find those and try to get this thing resolved. But that was in December. Here we are in August, and it still hasn’t been done. She still hasn’t gotten one red cent,” Perry said of Hall.


In short, the money's tied up in court. The "big, mean oil company" that's "stealing" the money from Ms. Hall actually has turned over royalty money to the court, and is continuing to make deposits until the court makes a ruling, and then the court will disperse the money in the account, the oil company will receive the final royalty judgement, and will pay out going forward according to the final royalty schedule. In cases where ownership goes to court, the "big, mean, evil, theiving oil company" is prohibited from paying royalties until final judgement is handed down.

In short, there's nothing they can do outside of what they have already done.


Except take a beating from KHOU that is, and suffer innuendos that they are somehow stealing money from an elderly lady who's family can't agree on the royalty share.



This is the second report in two days where KHOU ignored certain facts and, quite simply, aired a report that was wrong, dead wrong, and cast it to make "evil, mean, theiving oil" the villan.


Maybe Houstonians should ask KHOU why they should continue to watch their newscast if they are going to be subjected to stories that ignore key facts in order to push an editorial slant? There's really no excuse in Houston to run stories that are so obviously flawed.

They're not perfect, but my future news will be gleaned from KTRK-13. The Heller Hysterics are one thing, but at least the "news" is more reporting than storytelling.

Besides, boobalicious is no match for Lisa Foronda. You know its true.

In a perfect world

He would have had health insurance through his work, but as we all know this isn't a perfect world....

(from Mike Snyder of the Chron)
Among the nearly 6 million Texans who lacked health insurance last year was a sick, 3-year-old Pasadena girl whose father asked for a pay cut so his family could qualify for the Children's Health Insurance Program.

Josh Hebert's employer never responded to that request, said his wife, Kyla Hebert. The Heberts finally qualified by putting Katie, who suffers from brain lesions, and her older brother into day care, an expense that the program allows them to deduct from their income.

"We would much rather have them at home," Kyla Hebert said, adding that Katie missed a number of therapy appointments that her parents couldn't afford until they finally got her enrolled in CHIP.


It's no secret I'm no fan of a Government sponsored, single-payer health care system. If you don't know why not, then go try and get a Passport, go try to renew your automobile registration at the tax office, or try to do anything at any government office.

That being said I am a fan of ensuring that every child has access to health care. Every child. Not all of them except for those that are currently being demonized by a political party (i.e. children of illegal immigrants or children of the "rich"), each and every child. Because its not the fault of the child that the parents don't have insurance. That's something I don't mind my tax dollars subsidizing.

What I'd prefer is a State-backed, low-cost private user system, instead of Government ran health-care clincs, which is what I'm afraid America is eventually going to get.

As adults we're ultimately responsible for our own choices in life, that includes getting educated, and working hard enough to qualify for health care. At the bare minimum even poorer families can afford low cost, catastrophic care that's available. Yes, they might have to give up some luxuries, but it can be fit in any budget. No it won't be easy, but being poor is hard. (I know, I've been there)

The sad thing is stories such as this are emotional pleas that only serve to cloud the issue in a sympathetic fog, ignoring the fact that the majority of the uninsured are not in as dire straits as this family finds itself. Some of the uninsured simply don't want it. Some want it, but don't consider it a priority above a fancy car and flat screen TV. Then you have the people that truly need it, but can't afford it no matter how much they cut, and people who just have no clue.

That's a lot of different people encompassed in that 47 Million uninsured number to be lumping them all into one catastrophic situation. Republican and Democratic platitudes aren't going to solve the problem either. What will solve the problem is a well thought out National dialogue followed by determined, comprehensive action designed to enhance an American health care system that's among the best in the world at the top end, but poor performing at the bottom. The trick being to bring up the bottom half while preserving the excellence at the top end.

It's an election year, fat chance of that happening.

Brazoria County hops on the "trinket governance" bandwagon...

Here...we....go...

(from Richard Stewart of the Chron)
Brazoria County voters will be asked in November to approve a $75 million bond package to transform the county's crumbling old fairgrounds into a modern facility that can be used for indoor sports, horse shows, concerts, banquets and other events.

Included will be a 5,000-seat arena suitable for anything from indoor football to equestrian events. The facility would seat 7,000 for concerts.

A new 120,000-square-foot exposition center, three livestock barns big enough to hold a total of 300 horses, a 35,000-square-foot banquet hall and other renovations to the grounds on the southeast edge of Angleton are part of the package.

An alternate bond proposal, for $50 million, will also be on the November ballot. The cheaper package does not include the 5,000-seat arena.


Residents may save on gas
The $75 million proposal could raise the county's tax rate by 2.6 cents per $100 valuation, but backers say it would be well worth it.

The average homeowner would pay less in increased taxes in a year than the cost of gasoline to travel just once to a facility in another county, said W.B. "Jack" Taylor, a member of a committee appointed by county commissioners court to investigate the proposal.


Got that? Trinkets are "green" now. Who knew?

My view is that this is one of those bond issues that could have a tough go of it. In part because they're selling it wrong. They need to take the City of Houston's tack in promising voters that their taxes "will not be affected" by additional Government expenditures of $75 Million dollars and that only "a select few" will feel the crunch. C'mon Brazoria, get with the program.

So now you can add Brazoria County to Sugar Land as Houston area communities who feel a desire to construct "world class" facilities in their own back yard.

Hey, every year there's a new American Idol right? And there's only so much concert space in Houston to host b-list bands and acts we'll forget about in 5 years time.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

My view on Party Conventions.

I'm not a huge fan of Party conventions at any level. As such I don't breathlessly blog to you the details of said gatherings as if what's being said from the podiums there actually mean anything, instead of being the pre-scripted, focus-grouped dreck that they are.

In their current form, Party conventions are the antithesis of what free Democracy is supposed to be about, specifically, the free-form flow of ideas, both for (and against) the prevailing orthodoxy. In conventions, any disagreement is hashed out in back-rooms outside of the public eye. All the better to put a brave face on the procedings. What's left over is the inane, the hurt feelings of denizens who feel that their hard contributions and tireless work is somehow being slighted because they don't have seats equivilent to Guam.

Of course, there's always a chance to blame the "other" party. Your seats are worse than Guam becuase you live in a State that doesn't believe in the Dream. On a related note, I've heard that California delegates at the Republican convention will be selling hot dogs during the speeches, to properly reflect their State's ideological convergence with the party faithful.

That this control and ushering of ideas flies into the face of arguments that "top-down" authority structures are dead, meaning that the other, more authoritarian, party is somehow irrelevent (remember the permanent majority y'all) are summarily ignored.

In their place are a string of clap-trap speeched designed to fill the faithful, and easily herded, into a lather thus ensuring that no one in their right mind will want to attend dinner parties with them until at least two month's after the election (six months if they win), a fortuitous arrangement that allows things such as a "social life" to not get in the way of politicking for their candidate of choice. In other words: It's the crazies that are driving the "get out the vote" ship, while the rest of us are trying our best to pay the bills.

There are some who say that this lack of political fervor leaves us somehow inferior to our politically charged brethren, a charge that Lose and Eye scoffs at and to which the following visual rebuttles are offered:

(Image 1 courtesy of Robin Beck, AFP, Image 2 courtesy of Democratic Underground)

Not being able to open up a can of care regarding the conventions doesn't feel so bad when you view the target audience now does it?

Southwest shows first signs of weakness

For a long time Southwest Airlines has been cast as the little airline that can. While other, larger, legacy carriers struggled Southwest forged ahead producing profits where others produced loss. That could be changing in 2009...

(from the AP via the Chron)
Southwest Airlines, which had resisted the kinds of capacity cuts being made by other carriers, will eliminate nearly 200 flights early next year as it struggles with high fuel costs and a weakening economy.

Southwest will cut six flights from Houston to six different markets beginning in January, spokesman Chris Mainz said. But there still will be multiple daily flights on those routes -- which weren't immediately available -- and some of the adjustment is seasonal, he said.

The move raised doubts about the company's publicly stated goal of growing modestly in 2009 despite the airline industry's troubles.


Part of this undoubtedly has to do with the expiration of significant fuel hedges in 2009, which will cause Southwest to have to pay somethign closer to the market rate for jet fuel. A second reason could be an overall passenger decline that's affecting the entire industry. Given the realities of the energy market, this is a decline that could be semi-permanent.

Industry outlooks are mixed regarding future potential traffic, but virtually all of them agree that the long-term trends for air travel will decline. As global demand for fuel increases due to the introduction of China and India into the automotive world, fewer and fewer people will be able to afford the luxury of air-travel over long distances. Vacations will become shorter etc.

In light of these projections, Is now really the time for IAH to spend $1.2 Billion on expansion?

To date the paper of record hasn't asked that question, one wonder's if it will ever be asked, or if boosterism for expensive project with a World Class mission statement will continue to be the norm?

Bad energy reporting in the energy capital of America

News Flash: Oil a global commodity...

(from Shern-Min Chow of KHOU)
Reports indicate that U.S. companies are selling record amounts of refined oil products to other countries.

Experts say U.S. refineries export about five percent of the gas produced and nine percent of all the oil products refined.

“The last time us refineries exported as much gasoline outside our borders was WWII when we were helping to refuel allied nations devastated by the war,” said oil expert Dan Pickering.

If we kept that gas and diesel at home you would likely pay less, experts say.

So if we need all this extra oil, why are we selling 500,000 barrels a day of gasoline to foreign countries?

(snip)

Experts say that refiners are caught in the middle by having to pay producers like Exxon Mobile record prices.

Experts say that sales are down because Americans are driving billions of fewer miles. They say that big refiners that are hurting are looking for the best price.

Meanwhile in Mexico, gasoline is $1 cheaper a gallon because, like many countries, it subsidizes gas.

That has prompted some Texans to fill up south of the border.

“The quality is the same. The gas, they bring it from El Paso. It’s the same. I haven’t seen any difference in the function of the car,” said one driver.

Experts say there would be an oversupply of gasoline if the gas sold abroad were sold here instead.

“I guess a real critic would say ‘that’s not very patriotic’,” said Pickering.


KHOU should be ashamed that this report ran on their airwaves. Not only does it paint an incomplete (and biased) picture of the oil industry, but "shoddy journalism" doesn't begin to scratch the surface.

"Experts say" was used a staggering seven times as justification for "facts" in the story, yet only one "expert" was quoted, Dan Pickering.

If you have time, watch the video report than ran on the 10PM newscast yesterday. It's even worse. Instead of experts you get a couple of people with no grasp of economics talking about how "wrong" it was for American refiners to process oil for other countries. One guy even questioned how the refiners could sell the oil for profit.

Ignoring for a minute the economic realities overlooked by the report, we also have fallacies promoted in the story that need to be addressed.

1. All oil refined in the United States is U.S. oil. - False. Large portions of the oil refined by U.S. refineries are low grade, heavy oils from Venenzuela. We also import oil from Canada, and Mexico for refining. Knowing that does it seem out of bounds that we provide them with some refined oil in return?

2. Refineries have an obligation to Americans only. - False. Refineries have an obligation to the shareholders to run efficiently and turn a profit, and to the communities around them to operate in a safe manner. We can argue about whether they do the latter well enough, but saying that they should be required to ignore the rest of the world's energy needs so we can save around a dime per gallon is dishonest reporting.

3. American oil needs come first. - False. Every company has equal right to purchase refined gasoline and other products equally. American oil consumption doesn't occur in a vacuum. If all of the oil refined in Amreica stayed in America there would be excess capacity. While that might lower prices marginally in the short term, the long-term economic effect to the production capacity of other Countries would be devastating. Excess gasoline in America, for example, is better put to use in Mexico.

4. Oil companies are at fault for World oil policy. - False. It's not the fault of ExxonMobil or Chevron or Conoco/Phillips that Mexico has decided to subsidize gas sales. Say what you want about America's (lack of an) energy policy, but blaming big-oil for gas being $1 less in Mexico is ludicrous.

KHOU allowed Shern-Min Chow to run, uncontested, the opinion of Dan Pickering without offering a contrasting view. No refinery executives were interviewed (and there was no indication that anyone tried to contact them), no additional experts were brought in for opinions, there was no questioning of the "facts" presented by Pickering, nor was there any attempt to flesh out the details behind the opinions given.

And then there's this:
Experts say there would be an oversupply of gasoline if the gas sold abroad were sold here instead.

“I guess a real critic would say ‘that’s not very patriotic’,” said Pickering.

“The free market is not necessarily patriotic,” he added.


Neither is inaccurate and incomplete reporting of an issue that effects us all.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Change you can....wait...never mind.

Feels like politics as usual to me...

(From Wayne Slater of the Dallas Morning News)
In a week of hot tickets, the hottest will be a seat in the skyboxes the night Barack Obama accepts his party's nomination for president.

For the high-rollers and the political elite, the scramble is on for the glass suites that ring Invesco Field at Mile High. Call it skybox envy, an opportunity for corporate interests to fete Washington decision-makers in a grand outdoor setting.

Mojitos anyone?

"It's a bigger than the Super Bowl," said Texas lobbyist Ben Barnes, a convention veteran who'll be in one of the boxes on Thursday's final, historic night.


The Republicans are going to do the same thing, so don't go and get all smug on me pachyderms. Just wanted to throw that out there.

But if anyone really believes that the ascension of the Democrats is going to mean a change in the influnece politics of America then they're going to be sorely disappointed. The only thing that's going to "change" are the names of the industries and companies that benefit.

Obama is no more going to change American politics than Matt Schaub is going to lead the Texans tothe Superbowl this year. Political messages are just marketing tools, used to convince American consumers to purchase things they don't need.

Votes have been commoditized, they now have a price, just like everything else.

If you believe this let's talk about a bridge.....

Shoppers say frugal habits will stay when economy turns around...

(from the Houston Business Journal)
Frugal grocery store habits developed during the first half of 2008 may have a long-term impact on national shopping behavior, according to research results from the retail analytics firm Precima Inc.

Eighty two percent of U.S. consumers in a nationwide survey said they intend to keep cooking at home instead of eating out even after the economy improves and they have more money to spend.

The Precima survey completed in June asked 2,048 consumers to identify shopping practices they’ll continue and those they’ll drop when the economy improves.

About 80 percent of those surveyed said they’ll continue to cook at home instead of buying take-out meals; 84 percent said they’ll keep looking for specials in store flyers; 80 percent said they plan to use coupons as much as possible and 78 percent said they’re determined to make fewer trips to the store in order to save on gasoline.

Additionally, 54 percent intend to continue buying generic or store brands and 44 percent plan continuing to switch from favored brands to value brands.



Riiight. If there's anything history has taught us its that Americans have short-term economic-amnesia. Sure, we mean to do a better job saving money, clipping coupons, buying generics and cooking at home, but it doesn't last.

We want it to last, but Americans are not conditioned to be savers. It's going to take more than one economic shock to change engrained habits of the Baby Boom generation.

Heads Up!!!


School starts back today for most children, and while that's cause the local reporting types to get political. I'd like to get a little practical today....


Be careful when driving. If you see a school bus with the red lights flashing or the stop sign out, stop. It's a $1000 fine if you don't. And be aware of kids dashing out in front of you to get to the bus. In other words, slow down.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Sunday Fun links

Nigerian official: Jail the victims [ARS-Technica] or, How to lose friends and annoy people.

Phew!! [Yahoo! Sports] - Can you imagine the public reaction had they lost?

Biden's job is filling gaps and taking shots. [Mark Preston, CNN] - So Obama's hired an attack dog.

Convention first-timer's signal of Democratic Revival. [R.G. Ratcliffe, Chron.com] - Welcome to the big news story of three months ago.

What I meant to say was...[John Cornyn, Chron.com] - Frankly I'm surprised he even responded to the taunts of Noriega supporters. It's not like anyone is paying attention to them.

Animal Rights extremists nothing more than terrorists [Frankie Trull, Chron.com] - Finally, someone says what needs to be said about groups like A.L.F and others.

My constituents are JUST LIKE ME [Ken Salazar (D), Chron.com] - Amazing eh? A Congressman saying that he's in touch with his constituents, and that they are the key to the current election....groundbreaking.

So, you're telling me that global warming is responsible for.....global warming? [AFP via Yahoo! news] - Is the earth 'warming'? Temperature readings are inconclusive on this, but its certainly becoming dirtier as Countries (especially developing countries) dump tons of pollution into the air. Stories like this only divert our attention from the real problem, cleaning the place up.

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Thoughts on the Texans Pre-season Loss.

1. Get well soon Harry Williams...everything else is secondary.





2. The starter's lost 20-10, after that the Texans' first team held their own against a mix of Dallas' first and second team.

3. The pass rush is non-existent. Just like I feared. How many times did the Texans' blitz and not get to Romo?

4. Too many times the d-line was playing 1-2 yards in their backfield. Dallas' O-line dominance and strength advantage was all too apparent on several plays.

5. Playoff teams score touchdowns, average teams kick field goals. The Texans kick way too many field goals.

6. You wanna beat the Texans? Pass, pass, pass. The defensive backfield couldn't cover if you gave them a blanket. LB's are slow to the ball.


At times, in the first half, the game felt like a College game where a top 10 team was playing a Div-1AA team. The Texans felt that outmatched. Second half was nice, final result still doesn't matter.


Season prediction remains 7-9, 8-8 if they're lucky.


Thank goodness, College Football starts Thursday.

SOB's get smart, City cries "foul"

and neighborhood groups continue to call for reduced freedom....

(From Bradley Olsen of the Chron)
Houston has taken an aggressive stance in its decade-old battle to shutter topless bars and adult bookstores that operate too close to schools and day care centers, repeatedly arresting patrons and employees on charges of operating without a license or trafficking in illegal drugs or prostitution.

But nearly five months after winning the right to keep sexually oriented businesses at least 1,500 feet from residential neighborhoods, the city's officials have yet to close a single establishment.

The businesses have continued operating through a series of loopholes, claiming to be legitimate bookstores or "bikini bars" that do not need to be licensed.

(snip)

"I'm the first to tell you that I don't think the city should be shutting down businesses, but the area where those businesses are located is a high crime spot," said Bart Jones, president of the Briargrove Property Owners Inc. neighborhood association.

A community pool in that neighborhood sits a stone's throw from two adult businesses, one of them a topless bar. There are three such establishments operating within 1,500 feet of a school and two churches, Jones and Zummo said.

"It's not good because it's so close to kids," Jones said. "I get a lot of calls from homeowners closest to (the businesses), and they will always say that we've got to stop this, we can't have it."


For now the bad guy is adult (or sexually oriented) businesses. Next up could be liquor stores, and then maybe convenience stores that sell tobacco products, and then fast food restaurants, and then stores that sell too much candy, and then, if someone wants to shut down your place of business, all they have to do is buy the property next door, turn it into a park, and demonstrate how your business is "hurting the children".

That's not what happened in some of these places, they opened up after the fact, but in some cases the businesses were there first and then, due to poor planning, a school or park was constructed within the 'no' zone.

And, while there are certainly crimes at the locations targeted, I've yet to see convincing numbers citing increased child crime numbers nearby. So far its just a bunch of histrionics without numbers to back it up.

The City keeps stating that they're not trying to run these businesses out of town, however, when the businesses take steps to comply with the law (through use of pasties etc.) then the City changes the game and takes them to court.

Sounds like the City's trying shut them down to me.


And if that's the case, then fine. But let's at least have the debate regarding prohibition of Sexually Oriented businesses in the public square and not try to regulate them out of existence by sleight of hand and constantly moving goal-posts.

Because how we treat the S.O.B.s will become a blueprint for how the city deals with other types of businesses that fall out of favor in the future.

Friday, August 22, 2008

"My" Houston nabs ZZ-Top.

The band known for La Grange pimping Houston...

(from L.M. Sixel of the Chron)
ZZ Top, the band that made helped make La Grange and its “best little whorehouse” famous, is now pitching its own hometown.

The trio, who grew up in Houston and calls themselves the “little ole band from Texas,” was recruited by the Greater Houston Convention & Visitors Bureau to promote the virtues of visiting the city.

With their 1983 hit song Sharp Dressed Man playing in the background, the three classic rockers extol “H-town’s” restaurants, universities and golf courses in the 60-second video, which was unveiled Thursday at the bureau’s annual meeting.

As ZZ Top guitarist Billy Gibbons put it: “It always seems to come back to music and Mexican food.”

The video is part of the bureau’s “My Houston” campaign, which features print and broadcast ads featuring other local celebrities talking about their favorite Bayou City haunts. The list includes Grey's Anatomy star Chandra Wilson and Dan Workman, president of the recording studio SugarHill Studios, where Chantilly Lace and other hits were recorded.


Because nothing says "hip and modern City" like a 1983 hit from a band who's making a mint on the nostalgia tour.

Don't get me wrong, I like ZZ Top, have always liked ZZ Top. The little band from Texas is a State Treasure. That being said this item is bigger news to me:
After intense lobbying by the bureau and other civic leaders, the CityPass program added Houston to its network of cities.

The pass, which is purchased for a flat fee, provides admission to six attractions, including Space Center Houston, the Houston Museum of Natural Science and the Houston Zoo.

"It's a major coup for the city. It's validation and recognition that Houston is a great tourist destination," Ortale said.

In May, bureau officials said they hoped to sell 30,000 passes a year, aiming them at Latin American tourists who visit to shop and go to appointments at the Texas Medical Center as well as to regional visitors and even locals looking to save money.

Brown said reaction has been stronger than expected. In June, the first full month of sales, Houston sold 2,594 CityPasses, putting it ahead of CityPass sales in Hollywood, Calif., Philadelphia and Boston, she said.


Curiously, Sixel decided to bury this, very real, substantial item at the bottom of a story that's likely to have a small impact. I've been to Cities that utilize the CityPass, I've bought them. They are great deals.

Instead of promoting this benefit the Greater Houston Convention and Visitor's Bureau thinks that a Grey's Anatomy cast member, currently living in Hollywood, with only historical ties to Houston, is a bigger selling point than is an actual amenity that makes it easy to visit some of Houston's best places....

It's as if "My" Houston really means: "Come to Houston. OK, I won't be there but you should come anyway because I was there, once, and then I got out as quick as I could to be a star....but enough about me. You should come to Houston because we are celebrities and we say so....I'm sorry, what? What is there to do? Heck, I don't know, I don't spend a lot of time there."

Lose an Eye Friday Alert!

The management of Lose an Eye has decided to activate the Houston Perspective Regulation System. Please stay tuned for an important message to follow....




It's. Just. Pre-season.


We now return you to your reguarly scheduled Friday, already in progress.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

The eternal optimist in the news again.

Kevin over at BlogHouston spotted one I missed: It's a Keeling sighting!!!

The Chron's Nancy Sarnoff provided the prose...
Occupancy at area hotels is slipping, as the nation's economic troubles have resulted in weaker demand for business travel around the country and in Houston.

Areawide, occupancy is expected to dip about 1 percentage point by the year's end to 66.5 percent, hotel consultant John Keeling said at a meeting Thursday of the Hotel & Lodging Association of Greater Houston.

"It's reflective of what's going on in the rest of the country," said Keeling, senior vice president of PKF Consulting in Houston. "Because we're better diversified, we're affected by it."


So, occupancy rates are slipping, despite Keeling's predictions they would be increasing. At least Sarnoff acknowledges Keeling's error:
Last year, PKF predicted Houston-area hotel occupancy would reach 70 percent in 2008. But that was before the extent of the economic downturn was known.


Actually, from reports we're getting Houston has been less affected by the "effects of the economic downturn" than the rest of the Country, so that last bit of editorialzing by Sarnoff is incorrect. The fact is, Keeling has a consistent record of estimating on the high side mis-reading economic downturns or no. That's what should be reported by Sarnoff in these stories, yet she (and the Chron) continue to trot out Keeling everytime a hotel story hits the paper.

Here's the real funny bit:
Even though convention demand won't be as strong in 2009, Keeling said, business travel is expected to pick up, driven by energy, transportation and health care industries.

Houston's ability to compete for conventions would improve if downtown had more big hotels, industry experts say.

Of all the major downtowns in Texas, Houston's has the smallest inventory of rooms.

The Texas Medical Center, Keeling said, is also in need of more hotels. But with few developable sites, most of the construction is on the outskirts.


If you go read the rest of the article, the last few statements calling for more hotels in Houston is unbelievable. I don't know about you but economics 101 tells me that a time of high inflation and retraction in usage is NOT the time to expand ones portfolio. Add to that the tight construction credit market and building a second downtown hotel (which is what this was designed to be a dossier for) would border on negligent behavior, especially when you consider most of these hotels are funded in part by taxpayer money.

Also distinctively lacking from this story is any semblence of a contrarian view. All of the quoted "experts" are hotel industry insiders, or PKF associates.


You mean to tell me there's not one single solitary expert in Houston who thinks that building another downtown hotel at taxpayer expense is a bad idea in the current market?

Not ONE?

Or are they just not being asked the question?

That's the question news consumers have a right to ask of the Chron, are they asking the right questions of the right people in their reporting? Because these hotel articles sound more like boosterism than journalism. Anything with Keeling as the lead expert should be automatically suspect due to his track record of getting it wrong.

What's $10 Million among friends?

White asks County to help foot the bill for Downtown Dynamo...

(from Carolyn Feibel of the Chron)
Mayor Bill White has asked Harris County to join the city in a Dynamo stadium deal, hinting that a $10 million contribution by the county may be the final step needed to finalize a deal with the soccer franchise.

"I'd say the most important issue is how might the county participate," White said.

County Judge Ed Emmett confirmed that Commissioners Court support could be crucial: "I think there's a $10 million shortfall somewhere in their negotiations, and they're looking for a way to do that."


One hopeful sign is that Emmett stated the deal would hinge on its financial feasibility, not some pie-in-the-sky dreamscape promise of "community enrichment" and "quality of life" economics. Can the County get a return on this that benefits taxpayers or no? That's the only question that should be asked here.

That being said I still feel the best way to pay for any stadium is through private investment and user (read: ticket and concession) taxes. Make those that own the team and go to the games pay for the playpen.

But that would make too much sense.

OTHER EYES:

Lone Star Times

HC Judge: Oops.

But, but...you were my friend....

(from Liz Austin Peterson of the Chron)
Democrat David Mincberg makes liberal use of Mayor Bill White's name and picture in the first television ad of his county judge campaign, touting his work in the popular leader's administration and comparing their business experience and management styles.

However, he did not seek permission from White, who generally stays out of local races and has been working to cultivate a good relationship with Republican County Judge Ed Emmett.

White since has made it clear to Mincberg's campaign that he prefers people to ask permission before using him in a campaign ad, said Michael Moore, the mayor's chief of staff.

"He does not want that (ad) to be interpreted as an endorsement," Moore said Wednesday. "The mayor works well with Judge Emmett and has worked well with David Mincberg."


That's a move that's certain to irk local Democratic activists, but not out of character for White, and probably not unwise for a man positioning himself as a moderate Democrat with a history of working with both parties. What does surprise me is that Mincberg is planning to campaign on his "dollar-per-year" executive position, you know, the one he couldn't (or wouldn't) handle?

Yeah, that one. The one that he backed out of in order to run for office.

Uh-huh.


Let's be clear: These Harris Conty races are ones in which Democrats should find themselves with double digit leads. Because of the Rosenthal situation and what the State Republican party (hasn't) accomplished these races should be out of reach. That local Republicans still have a chance and that most Democrats are relying on "The Obama factor" to pull them to a victory speaks volumes.

Who was the genius who thought putting a Mayor White clone on the Countywide ticket (which includes places outside the City limit where White isn't NEAR as popular) was a GOOD idea?

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Nine days and counting. (Blog Meet)

Until College Football in Houston gets underway.

If you're a sports fan, want to be a sports fan, or just like hanging around after football games at The Ginger Man drinking beer then you should make plans to attend.

Especially if you have a blog, or read blogs.

Two rules:

1. No political talk during the football game. This is a hard and fast rule.

2. Anyone breaking rule number one buys a round at the Ginger man for those within earshot of said rule breaking.

No party or political philosophy denied, unless you're of the political persuasion that doesn't like football, beer, or skates on tabs. Yeah, you're not invited.

This is a chance to get to know others in the Houston Blogging scene without all of the pressure of making witty banter pertinent to the betterment of Houston. Nothing formal, just show up and say hello during the game. In other words no organization. I'm attending the game, and planning to have beers afterwards.


You're welcome to join us if you'd like.

Questions can be submitted in the comments.

The details:


vs.















In a game that's sure to be just as much fun as last year's 43-42 come-from-behind Rice victory.

If for no other reason than the fact that Run N' Shoot devotee June Jones (formerly of Hawaii) is now coaching SMU...



ASIDE: Rice recevier/quaterback tandem Jarrett Dillard and Chase Clements are only six touchdowns away from tying the all time QB/WR record. Given Jones' defensive philosophy, they could reach that milestone in the first half.


Time: 7:00 Friday, August 29th. (I'm going to show up and tailgate around 6'ish.) Somewhere in West Lot 4...



Place: Rice Stadium
Tickets: Rice Athletics...anywhere from $10-$50 per ticket, depending on where you want to sit.

Sex sells.

So, there's a tragic plane crash in Madrid, Spain where dozens of people were killed, but does The Chron choose to make that their top headline?

No....


They decide to top things off with a Rick Casey column on "penis size"...

Hurting for web-hits are we Chron?



(Note: Shortly after I posted this the website was changed to place the Madrid tragedy as the lead story...)

Anniversaries

Today is my 10th wedding anniversary, and I'll be working. Unfortunately I can't take the day off because of meetings. So the wife and I will both work all day and then I'll cook dinner tonight and we'll watch the Olympics. Our anniversary gift to each other this year is a trip to London over Thanksgiving to see her best friend, making this a deferred gratification type of thing.

The actual anniversary day however will be uneventful.

Oddly enough, today is also the 1st anniversary of AM 1560 The Game a station that I've been less than complimentary of at times but, really, it's only because I care, as a part-time listener that is.

So happy first anniversary to KGOW and happy 10th anniversary to my wife. Here's to ten more strong, happy years for all of us.

University of Taunts and Barbs

University of Houston-Downtown is considering a name change...

(from Jeannie Kever of the Chron)
Saying the University of Houston-Downtown needs its own identity, school leaders on Tuesday began the process of changing the school's name.

"UH-Downtown has undergone a dramatic transformation ... but we're still referred to as a branch campus," President Max Castillo said. "We are not."

UH-Downtown, located in the shadow of a freeway overpass on the northern edge of downtown, was founded in 1974. It is part of the University of Houston System but is a stand-alone university, as is the University of Houston-Clear Lake and the University of Houston-Victoria.


It's also an open-admission school, as noted in the article, which makes it an easy target for graduates of restricted-entry schools of the caucasian variety to mock UH-D for its high minority population and to cast dispersions and names.

It's also the institution that I graduated from. Not because my SAT's were low, or because I had a GED. Nope. I decided to go to UH-D because of logistics (I was working Downtown when I went back to school) and convenience (their schedule of night classes far outpaced the Central campus). A large portion of the evening and on-line students were just like me, people who were working full time jobs who decided to go back to school to either finish their education (that would be me) or who needed more classes for certifications. (a LOT of CPA's hopefuls were in my evening accounting classes). All in all it's a good school, one that serves an important mission in the educational heirarchy.

Because this is Texas, where educational parochialism rules, UH-D (and UH-Central for that matter) is forced to endure its share of taunts and barbs from those lucky, rich or smart enough to receive either a parental, institutional or governmental scholarship. Or those that were smart enough (or again, lucky enough) to not get caught making mistakes, or wrong decisions, during their college years.

In my case I dropped out of college to work. I needed money, and started a good retail career. I was a store manager in my early 20's and was making a good living. Later in life I wearied of the hours and decided to go back and finish my accounting degree. There are thousands of different stories at UH-Downtown, and I wish them luck in their name change.

Naysayers be damned.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Metro announcement not so "big" after all....

Talk about your Let downs...

(from Monica Perin of the Houston Business Journal)
A new plan to reform the nation’s surface transportation programs may make it easier for Houston to get federal funding for projects like the planned expansion of the city’s light rail system, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters said in Houston Tuesday.

“If plans to expand the light rail system are as good as local sponsors say, they will be easier to fund under our proposal than under the current broken federal system,” Peters said following a visit to the project.

Peters said a new Metropolitan Mobility Program for Houston and other major urban areas is central to the reform plan.

The proposed plan would give mayors and local officials a direct payment of federal funds and unprecedented flexibility to invest the federal dollars in their most pressing transportation needs and would eliminate controversial “earmarks” by which powerful politicians get funds for projects regardless of their merit, she said.


There's many different ways you could read this: 1. If a Mayor or County administration receives these funds and plies them all into light rail, Metro will be happy and content. 2. If a Mayor or County administration receives these funds and dispurses them around several transportation projects, Metro isn't going to be as happy. 3. If a Mayor of County administration receives these funds and plies them all toward road and commuter rail, Metro is going to be one sad quasi-private organization.

I guess it just depends on whether or not you are a "glass half full", "glass half empty" or "who in the he'll been drinking my beer!" kind of person.

Either way this is certainly NOT what Metro and their supporters were hoping to hear. Oh, they'll be able to spin this straight for sure, but there's no getting past the fact that they were hoping for an announcement of federal funding approval.

Oh, and you just wonder if that bolded text means don't you? Don't get dizzy with all the spin kids.

Odd that after excitedly reporting the pending announcement yesterday the Chron was scooped by the Houston Business Journal on the actual details of the thing is it not? Right now I can see the editorial staff bitterly putting the breaks on the 60 font "Feds give Green for Light Rail" headline in favor of something more mundane.

Heh.

Come along, take a ride on my Fantastic Voyage.

Mrs. Falkenberg, making Mrs. White jealous, one love letter at a time...


Ewwwww....
Let's take a minute to imagine our proper, professional Mayor Bill White, who prays over his ham sandwich at lunch and speaks in slow, premeditated sentences, in such a fix.

Let me say that I don't actually wish for the mayor to be engaging in tantalizing texting sessions with his chief of staff, recounting sexual liaisons, late-night hotel trysts and other declarations of longing that make former Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal's e-mailed sweet-nothings to his secretary look like, indeed, nothing.

But a columnist can fantasize.

Let's face it, White is lacking in the drama department. His brand of controversy, if you can call it that, is a floodway ordinance. When he talks dirty, he's talking about air quality.

Much of the polite discourse on Houston's City Council is no doubt a thin veneer of false civility, but heck if anyone can crack it.

Even when White gets frustrated, his idea of public acting out is a barb of sarcasm buried so deeply beneath his dry, Mister Mayor monotone that you'd miss it if it didn't sting you directly.


Why do I feel like I need to go wash my hands after reading that? Yuck. Gettaroom wouldya?

That said, l'il Red is right about one thing: Houston's municipal Government is way less scandal plagued, and more adult in action, than Detroit's municipal Government. Of course, the Grant administration was less scandal-plagued than the current Detroit Government but that's beside the point. The point is, can we say this without giving readers the uneasy feeling that they're reading an open love-letter to the Mayor?

Not that L'il Red is alone in her affection for Hizzoner. Area "watchdog" reporter Matt Stiles has been caught casting dreamy glances Mayor White's way, and Mrs. White's love letters are legion. Heck, showing Hizzoner with praise and rose petals must be part of the job description.

Mayor White, political "sexy guy" for the new generation of journalists. Or, maybe they're just enthralled by sarcasm? I don't know.

What I do know, however, is this: Kid 'N Play called, they want their dated saying from the early nineties back:
Commentary: Our civil servants are all that


And a bag of chips perhaps?

A very "teen columnist" headline don't you think? (oh..wait.)


Hey, at least she's trying out new material finally eh?

Sugar Land gets "trinket fever"

In a big, big, way...

(from Eric Hanson of the Chron)
This ever-growing Fort Bend County city has no Minute Maid Park or Jones Hall or George R. Brown Convention Center.

But, with voter approval, those well-known Houston landmarks could have smaller counterparts on 52 acres next to the Brazos River.

Sugar Land City Council is considering a measure to create an entertainment district that would include among other things, a concert hall, minor league baseball stadium and a hotel-convention center.

If council approves the item at its regular meeting today, the measure would be put on the November ballot.

The proposed district is similar to what is being done in other Texas cities, particularly in the Dallas area.


I could see a case for this if say, the Houston Dynamo were considering a move to Sugar Land, say if the talks for the Downtown soccer stadium fall apart. But absent of that this all feels a little bit like duplicity given Sugar Land's proxemity to Houston. It's not as if residents have to drive for five hours to take in a ball game, or spend a weekend heading to see the Circus, etc. All of these venues are within an hours drive. (OK, depending on traffic)

Still, its hard to stop the ball rolling once trinket fever sets in, so I've little doubt this will make it onto the ballot. How it will fare in November is another story however. A story that could be dependent on how well the salesmen on the City Payroll can get the message out that Sugar Land needs this to be "World Class".

Higher Education gets one right.

Unfortunately, It's got little to do with education, but at least they got one right...

(from the AP via the Chron)
College presidents from about 100 of the nation's best-known universities, including Duke, Dartmouth and Ohio State, are calling on lawmakers to consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, saying current laws actually encourage dangerous binge drinking.

The movement called the Amethyst Initiative began recruiting presidents more than a year ago to provoke national debate about the drinking age.

"This is a law that is routinely evaded," said John McCardell, a former president of Middlebury College in Vermont who started the organization. "It is a law that the people at whom it is directed believe is unjust and unfair and discriminatory."

Other schools in the group include Syracuse, Tufts, Colgate, Kenyon and Morehouse.

But even before the presidents begin the public phase of their efforts, they are already facing sharp criticism.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving says lowering the drinking age would lead to more fatal car crashes. The group accuses the presidents of misrepresenting science and looking for an easy way out of an inconvenient problem.

Both sides agree alcohol abuse by college students is a huge problem.


Of course alcohol abuse in Colleges are a big problem. They're a big problem because its a symbol of rebellion, doing something the 'rents don't approve of while being cool. Remove the stigma (and the allure) and so-called "binge" drinking would be reduced after a time, once you got over the initial 'shock-value' of the entire age reduction.

Would drinking and driving increase? That's hard to say, there's not much in the way or reliable statistics when it comes to charting the increase of, say, drunk-driving incidences between 20 year old drivers and 21 year old drivers. In other words much of what we hear about alcohol are scare tactics driven home by a few very influential advocacy groups who have done a good job convincing politicians that the key to killing the alcohol dragon lies in total prohibition for those under 21 and harsh punishment.

Yet the numbers continue to increase every year, despite the best intentions. What also increases are the number of people currently in prison, not only because of drunk driving, public intoxication, underage drinking, but a host of other crimes as well. I'm not advocating slackening the laws for drunk driving, but what I am saying is that maybe its time to try something new:

1. Lower the drinking age to 18. At 18 you're legally an adult, except when it comes to buying a beer. Where's the logic in that?

2. Increase alcohol education programs, make the successful completion of an alcohol awareness class part and parcel of obtaining a driver's license.

3. Increase the use of alcohol testing "kill switches" placed in cars of those convicted of DUI. It's a hell of a lot cheaper than 90 days in jail, and it still allows them to drive to and from work and remain a productive member of society.

4. Get rid of the blue laws. All we're doing by restricting access to alcohol is increasing its mystique.

5. Keep in place (and strengthen) laws that punish drivers who are under the influence and cause injury or death to another. This still should not be tolerated.


In other words, stop making alcohol out to be such a bad thing. In moderation its a good thing, studies have shown that. The problem is that we have set up our laws to give it a mystique that it doesn't deserve. The residues of Puritanism in our society.

Monday, August 18, 2008

Still more on the "good news/whiner" dichotomy

Mrs. White's techno whiz takes sides.

You're either with Bill White, or against Houston...

(from Jeff Balke via jeffbalke.com)

Whining Pessimism: FAIL

August 18th, 2008 by jeff

I’m always surprised at the pessimistic attitudes of some Houstonians in the face of anything that might improve this city’s quality of life. I noticed today on OfftheKuff.com that Charles commented on a story from the Chron about the success of Discovery Green, Houston’s new downtown park.

I hadn’t really read any of the naysaying, but I knew what it would be. Let’s see, no one will show up, homeless people will overrun it, it will be ugly just like everything else in Houston, parking will be horrible, it will cost taxpayers millions…shall I go on?

(snip)

But, I’m sure the very next attempt to improve the city with something new, cool and interesting will be met with public howling over what a waste of time and money it will be. I hope, eventually, the majority of us will realize that it’s easy to bitch and moan, but it accomplishes nothing.


So much for the Democratic ideal of principled opposition eh? Much the same run of options that's seen in the MetroRail debate. Support public funding of trinkets or count yourself amongst those who want to see Houston crumbling in the future in a swill of development, blight, and inner-Loop hell.

That's quite a difference between sides eh?

It's the Houston Progressive movement's "You're either against the terrorists, or against us" just on a micro, spending Houston's budget priority.

That being said I will allow this point: Those that whine while offering no options deserve skepticism, although not outright belittling. At their best they are driven enough to provide oversight against that which they despise.

But "whining" (disagreeing actually) with something because you have a different set of priorities for the money? (say, crime reduction, infrastructure improvement/maintenance etc.) Nah, that's not 'whining at all' that's principled opposition.

As for Discovery Green? Decent idea, poorly executed. Yes, the downtown park is nice, but the over commercialization of the place makes it feel manufactured and not organic (except on Thursdays of course, when the organic market is open) and the money was diverted during a time when I thought the City should have other priorities.

And then there's the name: Discovery Green. Be honest, it sounds like a bad sequel to a good Charlton Heston movie.

Despite all of this local political debate typically takes a more personal tone than State or National debate because of the politics of proximity and familiarity. When the same people hammer one another with the same arguments its not hard for even former friends to become heated over an issue or two. Add to this mix newly opinionated blogger-type-people and you have a powder keg of potential name-calling just waiting for a spark. The oddity in Houston is that the spark has really been struck by the side that's winning the debate. Say what you will, Houston is getting more and more progressive every day. You'd think that would make people happy, but winning the battle seems to have taken a back seat to smashing the other side's face in it. I'll end by saying this: When the Republicans took over all branches of State Government they had a great chance to forward their agenda. Instead of focusing on passing their legislative agendas, they pursued a short-sighted redistricting plan that damaged their standing with the public and blew-up their legislative agenda, the resulting melee damaged the Speaker of the house, throwing that chamber into disarray, reduced the collegiality of the Senate, making legislative compromise all that difficult.

Will Houston Progressives learn their lesson and use their advantage to build consensus and forward their agenda? Or will they focus their energy on responding to the taunts of those currently outside of power? The former would open the debate to honestly evaluate options to make projects better, the latter will short-circuit their agenda.

Disturbing.




(From the Crocs outlet at Houston Premium Outlets)

Taken during the sales tax holiday. Perhaps the most evil photo ever taken?

That's a question for others to decide.

"Good News" for Metro

According to Rad Sallee of the Chron...
The U.S. transportation secretary will announce "good news" regarding expanding transit in Houston Tuesday, a spokeswoman said. Metro has asked the agency to pay for half of two planned light rail lines.

The announcement by Transportation Secretary Mary Peters will be at 10 a.m. near the University of Houston-Downtown on North Main.

"We wouldn't be coming there to announce bad news," said the spokeswoman, declining to elaborate.


I'm assuming this is to announce federal matching funds per Metro's request, which seemed to me to be a formality after the approval of the lines, but hey, you never know what's really going to happen when Frank Wilson is at the helm.

Or, as we like to call him, Gordon Gekko Jr.

Federal funds, slipshod management and lack of public oversight....Time to get greedy Houston. Go for it.


ASIDE: From the comments...
BentaHellenbach wrote:
And suddenly all the suburbanites who've turned up their noses at Metro riders for years are screaming for a light rail. Wait your turn.


In all actuality most (not all) 'Suburbanites' (self-included) haven't been or aren't opposed to public transportation at all. As a matter of fact one of my laments about Metro is that I pay taxes into the organization and receive virtually nothing in the way of transportation solutions from them. Would that Metro designed it's rail system to bring 'Suburbanites' to work-places inside, or nearby, the Central City and then used a fast, efficient circulator bus system to get them into town we might be onto something. Alas, they don't seem to be willing to do that, instead opting for a development tool that doesn't provide a majority of Harris County residents with any transit relief at all.

What Metro (and the Houston Chronicle) has done is a very effective job at convincing the easily convinced that the argument is between "no public transit" and "public transit" by choosing to highlight the nattering-nabobs at the expense of every other argument on the vast prism of public transportation. The very, very gray debate that is moving people has been dumbed down to a black/white argument with no room in between. This is obvious by people thinking that 'Suburbanites' were "anti-rail" when they voted against a plan that obviously had very little in it that would justify their spending tax dollars to see it enacted.

Had Metro chosen to they could have mounted a very solid, very convincing commute solution for those in the suburbs and then expanded from that using buses and BRT (and, in a few cases, light rail) to funnel people from home to work. Instead they chose a plan that requires a large number of people to sell their homes and move into smaller homes with inflated prices in order to satisfy the whims of political opinion makers (i.e. those with deep pockets). Ironically a vote for true "mass" transportation became seen as a vote "against" the same.

The real transit debate in Houston should have been Metro's plan vs. a plan that can accomodate the transit needs of everyone in the Houston area. By obscuring the real issues and relying on hyperbole and impassioned speeches, editorials and blog posts from those unwilling to provide any in-depth, outside-of-the-box analysis Metro was able to control their message, and used the media to suppress all but the arguments that they wanted to come out against it.


I've said this a Million times and I will continue to say it:


I've never been anti-public transportation. I'm STILL anti this transportation plan because it doesn't do enough in the way of transporting the public, instead relying on people selling their homes and moving inside the Loop.

I wonder what the impact would be in terms of quality of life if 2.6 Million people suddenly wanted to relocate within the confines of Loop 610? Even with a fully deployed MetroRail system at the ready?

Citius, Altius, Fortius

If the outcome is determined by judges: The results are meaningless.

If the outcome is determined by a clock or a scoreboard: The results matter.

And no, this isn't a "pro-USA, anti-Chinese" rant, its just commentary on the sad, sad, state of judging in the Olympics. The United States has won its share of "judging based" medals, where the mystical "form" is determined by a mysterious "panel" to which politics is not only in play, its seemingly encouraged.

How else do you explain the Chinese Gymnast Cheng Fei finishing higher than Alicia Sacramone despite the fact that Fei landed her second vault on her knees? "Start value" is the defense cry of the sanctioning body, suggesting that its better to try something very hard and fail miserably at it than it is to perform solidly within your talent range. Are you listening U.S. Gymnastics? Time to pump those routines full of movements the athletes can't complete. The artificial scoring bump in "start value" will overcome any deductions for being unable to complete them.

Diving is the same way....huh? About the only thing American fans know about diving is that there shouldn't be a splash heading into the water. Seemingly good dives are scored low due to "reputation" in some instances, with the Chinese currently being given the benefit of the doubt. For a time it seemed that U.S. divers always got the nod from the judges, but that was then. FWIW: the scores in diving were just as meaningless when the US was winning them as they are now. Gymnastics, diving, figure skating (winter), ice dancing (winter), all a joke. Competitions masking as sport that are big ratings grabbers. Fun to watch, but with a structure that makes titles meaningless from a sporting perspective.

Are they sports? My answer would be no. They are athletic competitions lacking the objective goals that sports inherently contain. Runs, hundredths of seconds, points, height, etc. All of those things can be objectively measured, and quantified. Form is something that cannot be quantified, thus leaving judgment open to interpretation, and bias. The clock, or measurement device in true sport has no bias. A second is a second for the Chinese athlete, the American athlete, the Kenyan athlete, etc. regardless of popularity. Sure, there is some subjectivity in all sports (referees in basketball, football, umpires in baseball etc.) but the ultimate determination of winning and losing occur objectively: On the scoreboard.

And that's how it should be. It's so ingrained within all of us, the ultimate fairness of the measure of sport, that its very idea is encapsulated in the Olympic motto: "Citius, Altius, Fortius", "Swifter, Higher, Stronger" attributes that can be measured objectively. Not "a capite ad calcem" (from the head to the heel) or some other immeasurable variable, but the inviolate physical law of time and distance.

Those are the events and championships that matter. Everything else is just a distraction for ratings.

The Great Blogger Regulation Movement of 2008

(Not to be confused with the Great Blogger Influnce Bump of 2000, 2002, 2004-2008 et al.)

BlogSpeak - if you will...

(from R.G. Ratcliffe of the Chron)
The Texas Progressive Alliance is worried that a new Texas Ethics Commission proposal to the Legislature for the possible regulation of political blogs will hamper their free speech.

(snip)
Vince Leibowitz, Chair of the Texas Progressive Alliance, issued the following statement concerning the Texas Ethics Commission's recently distributed recommendation concerning blogs:

"Regulating Texas blogs would be regulation with out representation. Regulation that doesn't protect the rights of citizens is not good government.

For a state agency that twice ruled it was appropriate for a trustee of the Texas Employee Retirement System to disclose a monetary gift from swiftboater Bob Perry as simply a "check," to suggest that blogs should be subject to regulation is absurd.

Blogs are a form of political communication that should, by and large, remain unregulated. Independent citizen journalists and bloggers perform a valuable function in the political arena by prompting and promoting political discourse--on both sides of the aisle.


Here's the wording of Proposal 7 from the latest Texas Ethics Commission Report...
Recommendation No. 7: Political Advertising Disclosure Statement on Blogs Clarification of Section 251.001(16) of the Election Code, which defines “political advertising” in pertinent part as a communication supporting or opposing a candidate for nomination or election to a public office, that appears in a pamphlet, circular, flier, billboard or other sign, bumper sticker, or similar form of written communication or on an Internet website.
Certain types of political advertising are required to include a disclosure statement and certain types of political advertising are excluded from that requirement.3 The issue that often arises is whether blogs constitute political advertising and if so, they are required to include a disclosure statement.
In July 2006, the commission adopted a rule stating that the definition of political
advertising does not include communications made by e-mail and consequently those communications are not required to include a disclosure statement. The rule was
principally based on the legislative intent of the 78th Regular Legislative Session in H.B. 1606.4 In its Task Force Recommendations for statutory changes to the 80th legislature, the commission presented the “e-mail” issue and notified the legislature of the commission rule. The 80th legislature did not amend the statute, which validated the commission’s determination that the legislature did not intend e-mails to be included in the definition of political advertising.

POSSIBLE OPTIONS
1. Amend the definition of political advertising to expressly exclude blogs. If the legislature wants to include blogs in the definition of political advertising, the legislature may want to consider the Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules for addressing the issue. (Exhibits B and C). Under the FEC standard, most blogs are not regulated. Generally, the types of blogs that are not regulated under the FEC
rules are those from:
(1) uncompensated individual Internet activities, (2) entities covered by the press exemption, including qualified online publications, and (3) certain corporate and labor organizations. Generally, the types of blogs that are regulated under the FEC rules are those: (1) from political committees, (2) that are placed on another person’s website for a fee, and (3) from certain corporations.
2. Amend the definition of political advertising to expressly state that the definition of political advertising does not include blogs.


Truthfully, even under the proposed recommendations this blog (and this blogger) are "in the clear" because I would fall under sub-catagory (1) an uncompensated individual. Great for me, but some bloggers do garner an income from their activities but should still be free to offer up voter recommendations, as do several entities without any restriction. It's a matter of free political speech.

The only instances where I could see an argument for regulation would be in the campaign blogs of the candidate, and if a blogger receieved financial compensation, or was promised compensation, for their posting. That, I feel, should always be disclosed.

However, there's the small matter of the personal ethics of the bloggers in question as well. If more bloggers would follow the edicts of full-disclosure etcetera, then there wouldn't be a need for the Government to contemplate stepping in and restricting the rights of political expression for all.

Just a thought.

Obama gets political.

Maybe his new slogan should be: Name your price?

(From Richard S. Dunham of the Chron)
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's position on space exploration continued to evolve Sunday as the Illinois Democrat endorsed a congressional plan to add $2 billion to NASA's budget and agreed to back at least one more space shuttle mission.

In a policy paper released Sunday by his campaign, the presumptive Democratic nominee said his goal was to "minimize the gap" between the end of the shuttle program and the beginning of future manned missions. He also said he was hoping "to ensure retention of" thousands of NASA workers in Texas and Florida whose jobs are threatened by a possible five-year gap before the beginning of the Constellation initiative to send astronauts to the moon and Mars.

(snip)

Obama has not always been a strong supporter of additional money for NASA. Indeed, in December 2007, his campaign Web site declared that he would finance an early childhood education initiative by reducing funding for the Constellation program. And Obama told the Houston Chronicle's editorial board in February that he was not convinced that human exploration was worth the cost.


After Democrats from Florida and Texas complained, Obama pivoted and found other ways to fund his education initiative.


Ha-ha.

Worried about losing votes in a high-electoral count swing State? Offer up a heaping, helping of $2 Billion dollars in increased economic aid. Heck, he's already promised the "poor" $1000 each in incentives to cover high energy costs, what's another $2 Billion to ensure the Presidency eh?

Not that all politicians don't do this of course, even Mavericks, but it does sound remarkably old school from a candidate who's pinned his campaign on being decidedly new school. (replete with fist bump)

Never a dull moment....

When City Council member Jolanda Jones is the subject....

(From Jennifer Latson of the Chron)
The sparks from the highway looked like fireworks, but Jolanda Jones' teenage son saw what caused them: a car vaulting off the elevated stretch of Westpark Tollway before crashing about 100 feet below.

Jones followed the billowing smoke to where the car rested against a fence in the Hillcroft Transit Center.

Flames engulfed its front end.

"I think, 'Oh my God, someone's dead,' " Jones said.

The Houston City Council member and two other Good Samaritans happened to see the crash just before 1 a.m. Sunday. Together, they pulled the driver from the mangled, fiery wreckage.


Good stuff, and it sounds as if the driver of the car is going to live. That's quick thinking and action by Jones and two other (unnamed in the story) good citizens.

Jone's has had quite a week of extremes.

Friday, August 15, 2008

Bad day for the Chron.

The sports blogs have gone troppo, Mrs. White mis-identifies the President of a major world power (at least she didn't create a new International treaty), Corrects an erroneous headline accusing cops of beating a prisoner to death(then retracts, on page 18 or so)and now....

Runs an article on the sales-tax holiday that's "special"...

(from Joy Sewing* of the Chron)
For fashion-savvy shoppers, the economy's downturn has a silver lining: great deals are everywhere.

The options could be even more affordable during the tax holidays Friday through Sunday, when stores won't charge sales tax on most clothing and shoes priced under $100. Many retailers have slashed prices up to 75 percent.

(snip)

Corrigan also says jewel tones — especially purple and emerald green — will light up the fall and work well into next year. At Neiman Marcus' recent Last Call sale, we spotted a Searle purple shift dress for $174, down from $498, and a purple silk Etro jacket, originally $1,885, for $475.

(snip)


Fashion consultant Roz Pactor found a great buy in a black, military-inspired leather jacket by 2812, the clothing line by actress Sienna Miller and her sister, Savannah Miller. It was $241, down from $690, at the Neiman Marcus sale. She says it will work well over the staple of dresses and trousers currently in her wardrobe.

"I've always had the most success at that sale," she said. "I use it to supplement my wardrobe with affordable designer pieces." Pactor also picked up a pair of green-ostrich Prada flat sandals for $191 (originally $425) since green is one of fall's top hues.


Uh-huh, nice tips on shopping smart during the sales-tax holiday there Chron. That'll help those middle-class and poor families looking to save a little on back to school wear.

Never mind that the sale items mentioned don't qualify for the tax holiday, there's also the fact that NONE of them were found DURING the actual event either.

In other words: Instead of penning an article that could provide smart shopping tips to the majority of their readers during a once-per-year sales event, the Chron "Features" section chooses to pen a missive targeted at the 3% of their reading audience that can afford to spend over $1000 in clothing. At price-points that don't even apply to the once-per-year event.


Maybe sharing features with San Antonio would be a step up in quality?



*By the way: Anyone other than me think that "Joy Sewing" is a pseudonymn?

Chronicle Sports blogging...

Bringing you all the sports you can stand, and then some. (Or_ Not biased, just BAD: Houston Chronicle columnists)


Richard Justice: Please, comment on my blog, tell me what an idiot I am. I'm feeling lonely....OK, Vince didn't return my call.

Jerome Soloman: I know, you've never heard of me, I've never written anything of note, my analysis is one step above hackery and my prose is choppy...Oh yeah, Lance Berkman is fat. Fatty, fatty, fat, fat....

Steve Campbell: I really know about sports Dammit!!! Don't criticize me or I'll retort In bolded italics!!!!! - SC

John McClain: Insider NFL information taken directly from the newswires...Oh, and creepy, old man videos made with Anna-Megan (She's purty)

Jose de Jesus Ortiz: How I love thee Drayton, let me count the ways.



Ask yourself: Doesn't the 4th largest City in America deserve better sports coverage than this?

Ah well, at least it beats the Metro columnist...

Time for a political hearing check-up

If you're a Republican and reading this blog, and you're wondering "Why the heck is my party in so much trouble?"

I present to you Exhibit A...

(from Peggy Fikac and Clay Robison of the Chron)
Although bus safety remains in the spotlight following last week's deadly charter bus crash in Sherman, some lawmakers said they may look at easing a law requiring safety belts in new school buses next year.

"It was probably a mistake to require seat belts on school buses," said Sen. Jeff Wentworth, R-San Antonio. "It's extremely expensive, and there is no evidence it would significantly save lives or reduce injuries."

He said the Legislature may revise the law because some lawmakers now may feel they were "stampeded" into passing it.

Backers of the law defend it as a lifesaver that can give parents peace of mind.

"I will fight tooth and nail to make my colleagues ... understand how important this is," said Sen. Eddie Lucio, D-Brownsville


Maybe its just me, unpolished political amateur, decidedly NOT well-connected, admittedly unfamiliar with the delicacies of legislation, but wouldn't you think there are better times to bring up a weakening in bus seat-belt laws than one-week after one of the deadliest bus crashes in recent history?

Yes, I realize that Republicans will point to the co-author of the article, Austin bureau-chief and highly partisan columnist Clay Robison, as proof of case and you'd be well within your rights to point that out. However, the fact that they reported it doesn't change the fact that there's a Republican calling for weakening a bus safety issue at probably the worst possible time to come out against bus safety.

This goes above and beyond whether Sen. Wentworth's efficacy argument is correct or no, whether the seat belts are cost effective doesn't matter at this point. There might be a time to push this point, or revise the law, but right now sure isn't what I would call 'the sweet spot' for this type of action.

At worst it shows that Wentworth is allowing his judgement to be fogged by bus companies, (unfortunately, in Texas, campaign finance reports don't require that business type be disclosed, and many of Wentworth's donations are from lobbying groups. Someone with more time than I might be able to track this down, but I don't unfortunately) at best he's totally, utterly and completely politically tone deaf.

I'll leave which one it is to you.

Some stories shake you to your foundation.

This is one of those stories....

(from Jennifer Leahy of the Chron)
As the temperatures rose in his mother's locked truck on Thursday, authorities said the little boy managed to free himself from his car seat and climb to the front of the vehicle, where he put a key in the ignition.

But the 3-year-old died before he could escape the sweltering heat that soon overtook him in the truck's cabin, the Harris County Sheriff's Office said.



I don't have children. My wife and I made a concious decision to not go down the parenthood path. That being said my Sister has two little boys that we are around all the time. How in the world someone could FORGET about their kid in the back of a car is so beyond my comprehnesion that I don't even know what to say in cases like this.

In a Country where you need a license to drive a car, own a gun, own a dog, we still allow people totally uncapable to be parents to pop out babies with abandon. I'm not suggesting Government sponsored birth control, or Government supervised reproduction, I'm just making a comment. Such is the price of living in a free society.

Still, you wish the children weren't the ones to pay the price.

Building bridges.

Metro wants a shiny new bridge for the light rail system...

Possible name: The Shirley DeLibero Memorial Bridge...


(From Rad Sallee of the Chron)
The Metropolitan Transit Authority's light rail plans now include an "elevated structure" over Buffalo Bayou west of downtown, where trains will switch from westbound to eastbound tracks.

The structure, essentially a bridge that stops on the opposite bank, will lie between baluster-lined bridges on Capitol and Rusk and beneath the downtown "spaghetti bowl," already crisscrossed by several freeways and ramps.

Although technically part of the planned Southeast line, the structure would be shared by light rail vehicles on the East End line. Plans call for the two to merge east of downtown, where Harrisburg becomes Texas Avenue at Dowling. Together, their light rail cars would cross downtown westbound on Capitol and eastbound on Rusk.

(snip)

Mark Cover, a board member of the Buffalo Bayou Partnership, said the organization has not taken an official position on the plan, but added that it generally would want a "good-looking" and "architecturally sensitive" structure.

"We really support linkages to the various parts of the city into downtown and, to that extent, we are practical about it," Cover said.

The partnership led the effort to build the Sabine-to-Bagby Promenade, funded by various public and private sources, which would run under the Metro structure.

"We would certainly hope to have an opportunity to comment on it when the time comes," Cover said.


I'll bet they would like to comment, especially considering the money, effort and political favors that were spent to get the Promenade completed in the first place. The question is: Will one more bridge matter?

In the long run probably not, unless Metro botches the construction (not out of the realm of possibility mind you). During construction however the jogging trails and ambiance of the Promenade will be lost because of closure, and then who knows how it will have to be altered after the fact?

Still, those who support the Promenade also virulently support light rail so I'm sure this level of heartburn will be far less than the stress and angst that the proposed Eastside bridge is causing residents. Of course, there's a big difference between losing a jogging trail and having your place of business by-passed permanently, ask the businesses at I-10 and Hwy 6 how they like the new overpass.

Neither of these concerns should be worrisome enough to black flag the plan, just as the gripes about the I-10 overpass didn't stop it from being built. The "black flag" concerns for at-grade light rail have already been laid out fairly well by Tory, The Wizard, Kevin and a host of others (including myself) so I'll not broach that topic here.

What one does wonder with this is how much more is Metro going to ask for in order to build their train? And how much are Houston citizens willing to tolerate in order to have a second "world" class transportation system that increases, rather than reduces, congestion due to lost traffic lanes?

Thursday, August 14, 2008

HC Commish: It's getting pretty ugly in here.

I said you were sued before you said I was sued....

(from Liz Peterson of the Chron)
Business experience was a big theme throughout yesterday's debate between Republican County Judge Ed Emmett and Democratic challenger David Mincberg.

Mincberg wants voters to view him as the corporate guru with the management savvy to lead a county with more residents than 24 states.

But when Mincberg questioned Emmett about the size of the small consulting firm he ran before becoming county judge, the Republican pointed out his opponent has been sued hundreds of times for failing to pay county taxes, failing to pay vendors and allowing children to be injured in the apartments he owns.

Mincberg said he is proud of his record of buying older apartment projects and turning them into "good, safe, affordable housing." He said he did not know what Emmett was referring to when it came to lawsuits involving his business practices.


"Oh yeah, well you're a biased monkey with a squirrly word processor"

(from commentor James L. {just a concerned citizen I'm sure, in NO WAY associated with the Mincberg campaign})
I was at the debate yesterday and both this post and the report Liz wrote are pretty slanted. It was also brought up that Emmett has been sued hundreds of times too. And Liz's tone in the story and the post here make it pretty clear she just doesn't like David Mincberg on some personal level. That's fine. But if it interferes with her journalistic integrity, she should remove herself from the story.


Got that ya' poopy-pants?

BlogHouston has more on the debate which didn't go Mincberg's way.

(quotes from Liz Peterson of the Chron, as taken from BlogHouston *the Chron's website is flipping out again and all the links to the story are dead. Way to go Dwight! {I keed, I keed})
Asked how he would speed construction of the Grand Parkway so it can be completed as quickly as the Katy Freeway was rebuilt, Mincberg accused the county of awarding contracts for road-building projects to favored campaign contributors without accepting bids.

Mincberg said the county should follow the state's lead when it comes to competitive bidding.

"Unlike the way the I-10 piece was put together, the county's process is not only likely to not go faster, it's likely to go slower," he said.

However, state law bars counties and other governmental entities from accepting bids for professional services contracts with architects, engineers and land surveyors, a fact Emmett quickly pointed out.


This being a (very) down-ballot race and voters being what they are when it comes to local races, missteps such as this probably won't play too big a role in determining a winner. That's too bad, because it appears that Harris County is about to elect someone to its highest office who has no understanding of the law and rules as they apply to the County. That Mincberg is a Friend of Bill or a member of the same party as Obama is a terrible reason to cast a vote for him, but with BOTH parties pushing "straight ticket" balloting as the preferred option, we're going to get a LOT more elected officials who won't be able to order replacement ink for their pens, much less make decisions involving Millions of Dollars of public funds. I don't know about you but that scares the bejeezus out of me.

That being said, hold onto your butts, 'cause this one is just on the edge of getting ugly.

Sen. Dan "Short Attention Span" Patrick at it again

The Austin-American Statesman is his latest temporary fascination.

It started out as a joke. Either that or a desperate plea by alt-media conservatives for even more money.

(from Lone Star Times)
"Patrick, Hendee set to purchase Austin-American Statesman"

OK, we are TOTALLY making that up, BUT…

We couldn’t resist sending an electric jolt through the hearts of politicos and MSM reporters statewide who monitor LoneStarTimes.com via our RSS feed;
It would be very, very cool;
The Austin American-Statesman is, in fact, up for sale.


A joke that was given wings by off-handed remarks made by Senator S.A.S. himself:...

(from Ree-C Murphy's Chronically Right blog on chron.commons)

During his radio show on Wednesday afternoon, Sen. Patrick admitted he was interested in the prospect of buying the paper and will be looking into it.


Of course, all of this has the Church of Dan frothing with the idea of a "Conservative" publication in the heart of "librul" Austin.

Fine and good, until Sen. S.A.S. grows tired of the project, as he did with Lone Star Times, originally founded by him to be a "Conservative counter-voice in Houston to the Chronicle" and then abandoned in order to continue his cult of personality in the Texas Senate.

And then there's the little problem of consistency. All along Sen. S.A.S. has sworn that he's not demanding the Chron be conservative, only "fair and balanced". Now he's all but admitting that any news organization that he ran would be "far more conservative" than what they currently are. In other words: Bias isn't bias when it applies to his causes, only when applied to the cause of the other guy.

Then you have the small problem of matching your target market. In Houston (especially the Western half) I could see someone making a case for a "conservative" news-papering operation that might make money. Building a conservative empire in the middle of the land of Earle however doesn't strike me as a money-making, profitable venture.

Still, considering the track record and stick-to-it-tiveness of Sen. S.A.S. it only needs to bring in money for the first six months or so. Then he'll get bored, sell it to his associates and move on to the next diversion.

And he'll be sure to tell you about it on his one, true love: His radio talk show.


A pox on Lone Star Times for even starting this joke. And making Sen. S.A.S., a man with such an inflated sense of self that he's incapable of recognizing satire in which he is the subject, as the target.

Repetitive Writing (Part II)

An occasional series...

11. The key to fixing health care is increased Government spending and regulation.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

SD: 17 Let the battle begin!

Nothing like a Republican cat fight to get us in the politicking mood....

(from Alan Bernstein of the Chron)
Chris Bell will love this.

As he runs for the state Senate seat vacated by Republican Kyle Janek, Democrat Bell hopes some of the Republicans in the race (in such a special election, multiple candidates from each party can run) slice each other to shreds and allow him to grab the majority of votes on Nov. 4.

Now the scythes, indeed, have been unsheathed by surrogates for GOP candidates Austen Furse and Joan Huffman. Below are some pretty intense e-mail blasts from Furse supporter Dr. Steven Hotze and Huffman supporter state Rep. Dennis Bonnen of Angleton:


Alan then goes on to reprint the Hotze letter:
3) It is important to follow the money. Approximately 60% of Joan Huffman's contributions are tied DIRECTLY to gambling, liquor, and nightclubs. This does not include the $500,000 loan Joan Huffman and her husband Keith Lawyer made to her campaign. Since Joan is a homemaker, it is reasonable to assume that $500,000 comes from the profits her husband Keith Lawyer makes from his nightclubs

It also seems reasonable to assume that the $160,000 from outside gambling, liquor and nightclub interests, and the $500,000 in personal loans financed by liquor and nightclub profits, may cause Joan Huffman to look favorably upon legislation promoting gambling, liquor and nightclub interests in the Texas Senate, if not promote them outright. It does not seem that the gambling and night club interests would finance the Huffman campaign if they thought that she would oppose them.


And the problem is?

I'm constantly amazed why it is the so-called "conservative" branch of the Republican Party believes in "free enterprise" when it comes to making money but insists on dictating to me the "correct" way to spend said money. As it is, Huffman sounds like a candidate I could support (would that I lived in SD 17)

Except: (excerpt from Bonnen's letter)
Finally, I have spoken with former Judge Huffman regarding gambling.
Former Judge Huffman is unequivocally opposed to gambling and the
expansion of gambling and will not vote to expand gambling under any
circumstance as our state senator.


Dang. Keep your hands out of my pocketbook.

The other "contender" in this race is perennial Democratic candidate Chris Bell (who's website has thankfully dropped the boxing gloves) who hasn't, to this point, made any statement on expanded gambling or really on much of anything except for raising taxes to fund education, health care, (worthy causes, but he doesn't have any "plan" to back it up other than "spend more") and his new found hammer of ethics reform.

So, we have one candidate who wants to take your money and spend it for you, and two candidates who want to tell you how to spend it.

Three more in the increasingly long line of poor candidates foisted (or regurgitated, in the case of Bell) on local voters by the two major parties.

Is this the best we can do?

Want Ads you might see.

Straight party seeking Straight Male: Qualified political and judicial candidates for embattled (former) majority party to run for office in Harris, Brazoria and Fort Bend Counties. Qualified candidate must be honest, culturally sensitive and morally upstanding. Former lobbyists need not apply.

Contact: Jared Woodfill of the Harris County Republican party for information


Geez.

Oh, and don't get too high and mighty InterLeft, your main guy for the Presidency admitted to boinking a fake-blonde space case while his wife recovered from cancer treatment. (and possibly fathering her child)
-------------------------------------------------------------

Wanted: Qualified, well-known and charismatic candidate for Texas Statewide office possessing good campaign skills and a grasp of important issues. Ability to raise funds a must.

Contact: Boyd Richie with SERIOUS Inquiries ONLY!!! (Yes, that means YOU Gene Kelly)



And before the Bloggers O' the Right get too worked up with glee, remember this: You're the party with Pat Lykos on the ballot.
--------------------------------------------------------------


Another day, another sex scandal......And the Chron wonders why we're all watching the Olympics?

Perchance its because politics is a mess.

Meet Molly




Two weekends ago we found a couple trying to unload this dog. Classic case of not knowing what you are getting into when you purchase that cute little puppy and they start growing like a weed.

Molly is a Chocolate Labrador Retriever, around 9 months old, friendly and in good health. Fortunately for her the in-laws were looking for another lab to replace Cody, their yellow lab who had a stroke and had to be put down. (he was 12, getting up there in Lab years)

I'm now happy to say that Molly is living the sweet life of a pampered pup and peace has returned to our household. Duchess, our Rhodesian Ridgeback, was NOT at all happy with the thought of sharing her new home with another girl.

Aside: They thought about changing her name but ultimately backed away from that idea because she was already responding to Molly. If they had decided to go with a name change I wanted to name her Ghirardeli, Geri for short.

Did Bush see this in Putin's eyes?

Not good...

(By Christopher Tochia and Matti Friedman of the AP via the Chron)
Russian tanks rolled into the crossroads city of Gori today then thrust deep into Georgian territory, violating the truce designed to end the six-day war that has uprooted 100,000 people and scarred the Georgian landscape.

Georgian officials said Gori was looted and bombed by the Russians. An AP reporter later saw dozens of tanks and military vehicles leaving the city, roaring south.

Troops waved at journalists and one soldier jokingly shouted to a photographer: "Come with us, beauty, we're going to Tbilisi!"


So much for the "cease-fire" negotiated by Nicholas Sarkozy. Although its not yet clear who broke the deal.

America's respose? Well, honestly, what can we do but sit on the sidelines and hope that the European Union has the ability to broker peace in their own backyard? Something, it should be noted, that the EU has been asking America to let it do for quite some time now.

Another sad note is that this situation is increasingly being viewed by partisans as nothing more than a dress rehersal for Obama and McCain to act Presidential. Unfortunately for the Georgians, we're playing partisan politics with their homeland and lives.

OTHER EYES:
Unca Darrell - has some great pictures of Georgia on his site today.

Brent Clanton - reposting a brilliant synopsis of the situation via George Friedman and Stratfor.

Why fashion writers shouldn't do sports commentary...

Exhibit A...

(from Clifford Pugh of the Chron)
Despite the huge time difference between the U.S. and China, the Beijing games are drawing a larger-than-expected audience.

Experts are offering lots of highbrow explanations — the spectacle, the pageantry and the intense competition — for the high ratings.

But we know the real reason viewers are glued to their sets.

Call it the "Oblique Olympics."

Admit it: There's something irresistible about men and women with well-defined abdominals and very little clothing. NBC must surely think so. On recent nights, the network has showcased athletes with abs of steel and indented obliques (that angular sliver of muscle along each side of a well-toned abdomen.)


Uh-huh, yeah. This is the second time Pugh has forwarded a sexistsexual connotation for why people like the Olympics, first time he accused volleyball of being "sexist" without checking the rules of the game. (Something I did for him, in the comments)

So now he's written a second tome accusing us of all being nothing more than a group of Pavlov's dogs slobbering on cue when the beautiful people stand up and the National Anthem is played.

That's a fine theory, IF you ignore the historic athletic acheivements of Michael Phelps, if you ignore the theatre that was women's gymnastics, if you ignore the grit and determination of the men's gymnastics team, if you ignore the sheer dominance of Misty May-Traynor and Karrie Walsh, if you ignore the athleticism of the Redeem Team, if you ignore the nail-biting final leg of the Men's 4 x 100 freestyle relay.

In other words, Pugh's theory is workable if you ignore the fact that an Olympics is going on, and that the backdrop, athletic competition and drama of the entire event is second-to-none in terms of entertainment.

His charges make sense if you ignore the irony of a "fashion writer" who routinely attends events featuring women at near-starvation levels wearing clothing that costs more than some people make in a month chiding us for our lack of sexist outrage.

Just because Clifford Pugh watches the "obliques" with joy doesn't mean that the rest of us do.

Most of us just appreciate a good athletic showing, and its the "glamour" events that reel in the viewers.

That's not sexist, or sexual, its fact. It's also fact that a lot of athletes have well-proportioned, well-developed bodies. That's part and parcel of being the best.

Nothing sexist (-ual) about it.

A misstep of Continental proportions....

In a word: Oops....

(From Bill Hensel Jr. of the Chron)
Continental Airlines has struggled with oil prices all year, first on their way up and now on the downside.

The Houston-based carrier, which ramped up its market hedges as it was battered by record fuel costs, appears locked into paying premiums rather than discounts now that energy prices have tumbled.

"Continental was the last mover. Others responded more quickly," said Harlan Platt, a finance professor at Northeastern University who follows the airline industry and who expressed skepticism when Continental announced the hedges as oil prices were rising this spring.

A hedge is basically an insurance policy against price fluctuations. When an airline purchases a type called a collar, it sets both a maximum and minimum price it can pay.

According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Continental capped about 33 percent of its expected fuel cost in the third quarter at the average equivalent of $140.81 per barrel of oil.

But that hedge, or collar, also carried an average floor of $121.90 per barrel of oil, and another 29 percent of Continental's third-quarter fuel costs were hedged with a floor equivalent to $3.26 per gallon of heating oil.

Oil futures settled Tuesday at $113.01 and heating oil settled at $3.08, both easily under the floor prices. That means Continental, at least in the short term, could be paying higher prices than the spot market for more than half its fuel.


Being ignorant of the decisions making process at Continental I'm not going to use this space as a forum to cast blame. For all I know this was a finance decision that was made outside of the executive boardroom. (although I doubt that)

The article goes on to clarify some points and also point out that most (not all) of the hedges are options, meaning that Continental can walk away from them and purchase fuel at the spot price which, for now, is cheaper. I hope so.

If the old saying "What's good for General Motors is good for America" rang true at the time then "What's good for Continental is good for Houston". Albeit, maybe not on the same scope and, with Houston's still-majority-petroleum based economy taken into consideration, maybe not with much effect. But a healthy Continental is needed to ensure the health of George Bush Intercontinental Airport, and all of the direct and support jobs that come with it.

Which begs the question: Is IAH still considering the Terminal B expansion when other airports are slowing down?

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Who says the Republicans aren't learning from the Democrats?

When it comes to Internet politicking that is....


Political Internet lesson #1: Highlight your opponents ethical, criminal and common sense lapses while ignoring (or excusing) your own.


Check.

Political Internet Lesson #2: Blame your opponents for the downfall of civil liberties, and accuse them of trying to "shred the Constitution" (note: you must use over-the-top descriptors such as "shred" and "blatant disregard" for effect)


The example

The student learns

Political Lesson #3: Hyperbole, hyperbole, hyperbole. You can't spend too much time blowing your small contributions to the cause out of proportion.

Democrats

Republicans


Political Lesson #4: Use your parties' talking points but don't forget to blame the other party for using their talking points at the same time.

The example

Fast Learners


Yup, the Republicans they are a-gainin' on those Democrats. (Well, except in terms of expected election results that is)


And now, for the rest of us:

Political Lesson #5: It is the great desire of every political party to control the content of the so-called "grass-roots" without the latter realizing it.

This happens more than either side cares to acknowledge.


True, the Republicans have a ways to go in terms of self-aggrandizing posts, but they are at least the equal to the Democrats when it comes to calling the electorate stupid and forwarding non-sequitor personal attacks when logic breaks down.

Although I will admit that the Democrats are much more organized than are the Republicans. Top-down works well for the Party as a whole, but its a terrible way to try and organize an Internet "movement", of course, mob-rule limits scope (as we've seen) so whatcha' gonna do?

My view is that unless you have thousands of members with deep pockets who can contribute more funds than what basically amounts to a one-time petty cash donation then you're probably better keeping your blogging at the level of "hobby" lest you discover you're the butt of cocktail party jokes told by real campaign financers.

Is this even "really" Beijing?

Fake fireworks, fake performers, fake ages on Chinese gymnasts, fake tickets and, finally, fake judging.


All of this is why the Olympics continue to have a big black eye in terms of International legitimacy. It's also why any event that's scored via the "judging" system should not be taken seriously. Not gymnastics, not Olympic boxing, not diving etc. Unless you have a clock, or a finish line or some other impartial means of judging, then politics will always come into play. Always.


And why shouldn't China manipulate its way into the top spot in the National medal count? They've already displayed a willingness to manipulate (or distort) reality in every other aspect of the games.

Hitler wanted to make a political statement about the so-called "master race" in 1936 Berlin, he was just too stupid to rig the results. More and more its appearing that the Chinese are much, much smarter than that as they attempt to use the 2008 games to make their claim of superiority.


Nice of Houston to copy their air quality during the games however.

Repetitive Writing

You've heard of "creative writing" right?

This is the opposite of that....


1. The way to fix charter busses is through increased Government spending and regulation.

2. The way to fix the Texas school system is through increased Government spending and regulation.

3. The way to fix the Texas University System is through increased Government spending and regulation.

4. The way to fix the crane and apartment problems is through increased Government spending and regulation.

5. The way to fix Houston's pollution problem is through increased Government spending and regulation.

6. The way to fix the deputy patrol system is through increased Government spending and regulation.

7. The way to fix the energy problem is through increased Government spending and regulation.

8. The way to solve the gun problem is through increased Government spending and regulation.

9. The way to fix the economy is through increased Government spending and regulation.

10. The way to fix the HPD crime lab is through increased Government spending and regulation

Beijing, via Houston.

Congratulations to Katy's Glenn Ellner for his Gold medal winning performance in double trap shooting at the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

Congratulations also go out to Houston area gymnast Rhaj Bhavsar and the entire United States Men's Gymnastic team on pulling the upset and winning the team bronze.

(Congrats also go out to David Barron for penning this lead-in to the story:
Fueled by an underdog’s mentality, a burglar’s guts and the grace under pressure that is a minimum requirement for performing on the Olympic stage, the men of USA Gymnastics won a bronze medal Tuesday afternoon (Monday night CDT) in the men’s team competition.



A good job by all.


Currently the United States has a slim one medal lead over the Chinese, but I'm assuming that will change soon, and China will eventually take the medal lead in their home country.

Of course, we haven't even scratched the surface on Track and Field as of yet, so anything can happen.

Monday, August 11, 2008

The Government we deserve

Fresh from last weekend:

They'll elect anyone to office these days...

(from Carolyn Feibel of the Chron)
Councilwoman Jolanda Jones is accused of interfering with police officers conducting an arrest last week outside a Third Ward gas station, according to a Houston Police Department report obtained by the Houston Chronicle.

Jones denied that characterization Friday, saying that officers rebuffed her when she tried to question them after the arrest of a 25-year-old man. Police said later he was wanted on an outstanding warrant for marijuana possession.

Jones is a criminal defense attorney who joined the City Council in January.


So, let me get this straight: Even by her own admission casting it under the best light possible Council-member Jones interfered with an arrest in progress, without knowing any of the facts, and assumed the HPD was in the wrong?

As it turns out there was an active arrest warrant for the arrested.

This happened over the weekend so it will probably just fade away but, when you add it to "other" actions by Ms. Jones (including openly feuding with other council members) and weigh it against her "accomplishments" (read: painting her office pink) you have all of the makings of a politicians that's both an argument for term-limits (hey, at least she won't be there long) and an argument against (you mean she's all we got left?) them at the same time.


Maybe she's just really trying to make Ada "Right to exist" Edwards look good in retrospect?


More: Chron: Local Politics, and here and here

Further proof PeTA doesn't belong at the adult's table....

I give you: pro-vegan ads on the border fence...

(From James Pinkerton of the Chron)
While many view the contentious border fence as a government fiasco, an animal rights group sees a rare opportunity.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals plans Tuesday to announce an unusual marketing pitch to the U.S. government: Rent us space on the fence for billboards warning illegal border crossers there is more to fear than the Border Patrol.

The billboards, in English and Spanish, would offer the following caution: ''If the Border Patrol Doesn't Get You, the Chicken and Burgers Will — Go Vegan."

''We think that Mexicans and other immigrants should be warned if they cross into the U.S. they are putting their health at risk by leaving behind a healthier, staple diet of corn tortillas, beans, rice, fruits and vegetables," said Lindsay Rajt, assistant manager of PETA's vegan campaigns.


Except that its been proven time after time that a diet rich in fish, chicken, lean, grass-fed livestock is more healthy than a straight vegan diet for most people. The problem comes not because of eating meat, but from eating overly processed meat kept in cruel conditions.

Of course, PeTA chooses to ignore that, as they also choose to ignore the scientific evidence that humans are omnivores....

Omnivores....that means eating a variety of foods, not just nuts, twigs and overly processed soy designed to fool the eater into thinking they're eating meat.


If Veganism is so natural then why do we have to "fool" ourselves with "fake" meat?



Here's a tip PeTA: Let people eat what they eat, you worry about Not killing the animals under your care.

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Pelosi on the Planet.

Remember this one?..."I'm trying to save the Planet, I'm trying to save the Planet, I'm trying to get more power..err...save the Planet."

Ah yes, Pelosi the principled opponent to "Big Oil" determined to save the Earth single-handedly, a modern day (female) political Atlas bearing the weight of the world on her (very rich) shoulders....

Yeah, not so much...

(from Martin Kady and Patrick O'Connor of Politico)
California Democrat Nancy Pelosi may be trying to save the planet — but the rank and file in her party increasingly are just trying to save their political hides when it comes to gas prices as Republicans apply more and more rhetorical muscle.

But what looks like intraparty tension on the surface is part of an intentional strategy in which Pelosi takes the heat on energy policy, while behind the scenes she’s encouraging vulnerable Democrats to express their independence if it helps them politically, according to Democratic aides on and off Capitol Hill.

Pelosi’s gambit rests on one big assumption: that Democrats will own Washington after the election and will be able to craft a sweeping energy policy that is heavy on conservation and fuel alternatives while allowing for some new oil drilling. Democrats see no need to make major concessions on energy policy with a party poised to lose seats in both chambers in just three months — even if recess-averse Republicans continue to pound away on the issue.


In other words: Lie to your constituents to get re-elected, and then we're going to do whatever it is we want to do.

Granted, that tack has worked fairly well for the Republicans recnetly, but eventually you run the risk of angering large voting blocks that you count on and losing your grip on the electorate.

Republicans have lost a tight grip on Evangelicals and their conservative base, Democrats are running the risk of losing the moderates. It might not happen this year, but the blowback could be similar to what's happened in Texas for the last 10 years.

That's why you shouldn't put much faith in partisan bloggers' attempts to characterize their parties ascension as "the rise of a permanent majority" or the "death of the opposing party". Politicians are animals of convenience, instead of standing on principle they go whichever way the wind blows, say whatever it is they think an audience wants to hear and then use a labyrinth of Congressional voting rules to obscure their actions. Eventually however the rubber or results has to meet the road of rhetoric. If moderate and conservative Democrats go home and campaign on promises of increase drilling and production only to return to a Congress that has a Democratic majority sending bills to a Democratic President and cast votes that increase the costs of the poor and middle class?


"Four and out" anyone? It'd be like the post-Carter slaughter all over again.

If Democrats are serious about restricting production and keeping the price of energy high to move the market toward renewables then fine. Go out to the American people and make the case why its a better option.

Because if you can't campain on what you supposedly "believe" in, then its probably not worth strong belief in the first place.

Update: The rodeo didn't blink.

Mea Culpa time: Yesterday when putting together the Post Edouard linkfest I just kind of read the stories I linked to, but didn't go much further than that. Hence a linkpost.

Fortunately, regarding the Texans, Rodeo, Astrodome issue, BlogHouston did a full post.

And it seems that the Rodeo and Texans haven't "blinked" after all, despite the Chron's spin.

Mrs. White: Local Government should control your diet.

Think that headline is overblown? Los Angeles correct to restrict fast food...

In Los Angeles, the health and economic implications of widespread obesity truly are cause for alarm. In low-income South L.A., 30 percent of adults are obese.

That's nearly one-third of the area's population at risk for Type 2 diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses; it's also the patient pool least likely to have insurance for hugely expensive ailments that can linger for decades.

To attack this problem, the Los Angeles City Council last week came up with an apparently radical plan. It voted to ban construction — for one year — of any fast-food restaurants within a 32-square-mile South L.A. neighborhood.

If the council had plucked out one neighborhood in order to engineer its eating habits, this idea would be disastrous. It would declare that free market and personal choice work fine for everyone else in Los Angeles, save one unfortunate neighborhood.

The neighbors themselves would be outraged: What other limiting decisions might the city take on their behalf, leaving personal discretion for everyone else?

It turns out, though, that the moratorium supports several ambitious planning efforts that South Los Angeles residents have already launched. In that context, the moratorium could really make a difference.


So, here's the rub....If Los Angeles would have only selected one neighborhood in which to restrict personal choice, that would have been bad. If they (or by extension, Houston City Council) want to restrict the choice of the entire community that's not Nanny-stateism, it's good politics. Oh, and the moratorium is in-line with the political ideals of the elite. In other words, it's popular, suggesting that unpopular thoughts and actions are fine and dandy to restrict or limit, provided they advance the goals and agenda of the ruling power.

Based on that line of thinking I'm curious to see when the Chron will welcome with open arms the State of Texas official censor whose job it will be to protect the public from opinions and stories that are "unpopular" with the current elected party. I'm sure they'd also be ok with accepting a 'moratorium' on new subscription sales in areas where their political outlook is "unpopular"? Just for one year mind you, so that people can avail themselves of other news options and then, after the moratorium is up, maybe they can decide whether or not they even need the newspaper at all?

After all, even though dead-tree papers are mostly recycled, decreasing their use would still reduce landfill mass significantly, and on-line news resources generate very little waste, and the carbon impacts are much smaller than the printing presses and buildings of the Chronicle.

I'm awaiting that editorial from Mrs. White, and assurances that "Nanny-Statism" has nothing to do with those decisions.

What's good for the goose after all....

TX Senate: Back to the Past

Meet the "new" plan, same as the old plan?

(from R.G. Ratcliffe of the Chron)
Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Rick Noriega unveiled an immigration reform plan Wednesday that is very similar to a measure that died last year largely because of opposition from Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn.

Noriega touted his plan as a "bold" measure to fix a "broken" immigration system, but it was almost identical to bipartisan legislation that had been backed by President Bush and Texas business leaders in June 2007.

"Without question we know as a matter of fact that Mr. Cornyn was an obstructionist on the last debate on comprehensive immigration reform," Noriega said. "He hasn't done anything in six years to help reform immigration."

Cornyn's campaign described the Noriega plan as "obviously written by inside-the-beltway liberals."


The above excerpt from Mr. Ratcliffe encapsulates brilliantly the lack of quality Texans are stuck with in this political tussle.

Rick Noriega's "bold plan" is nothing more than a rehash of a plan crafted last year by bipartisan groups. It's been pulled off the shelf of failed legislation, dusted off, and emblazoned with a "Noriega for Senate '08" bumper sticker before being press-released to ogling supporters, a skeptical media, and snarky bloggers (hi). Is it a bad plan? No, because I really didn't think the original McCain plan was all that bad, and (let's be honest) this is what that is. What it's not, however, is "a solution to Washington gridlock" as characterized by Noriega. Lest we forget this was the same plan that got bogged down by Washington Gridlock. Uh-huh, yeah.

Then we have John Cornyn, who's campaign offers nothing more in the way of substantial criticism than: "obviously written by inside-the-beltway liberals." Ummm....the plan was largely crafted by John McCain and President Bush's advisors, there Big John, hardly the work of "inside-the-beltway liberals" there guy. Now, it may have been a plan that you have opposed since the beginning, but all you're countering with is "build a wall" and "deport 'em", hardly the hallmarks of a long-term workable plan.

As-yet undetected in this little bit of political drama is the fact that the Democratic challenger for the Texas Senate is forwarding a plan similar to the one drafted by the presumptive Republican nominee for President, while the Republican incumbant for the Senate is opposing said plan. I wonder if anyone has sat down in a quiet room on the campaign busses and given that a moments thought?

Anyone?

Chron discovers Metro's nonsensical bus routing.

It's about time...

(From Leslie Casimir of the Chron)
Metro bus rider Pablo Camarillo's daily commute to work is so long that he often sees both sunrise and sunset — when he manages to stay awake.

To arrive on time, the auto parts warehouse worker sets off on an odyssey that starts at 5:40 a.m. with him boarding the 88 Hobby Airport bus at the corner of Sabo and Fuqua streets. He gets off on Broadway and Morley to transfer to the 73 Belfort Crosstown, which takes him to the Texas Medical Center. There, he gets on the 14 Hiram Clarke bus that takes him to his job on the southwest end of town. If things go well, all this happens by 8 a.m.

His evening commute starts at 6 p.m.

"I wish I had a car," said Camarillo, 30, who spends four hours of his day on a maze of Metro buses. "I have to get some sleep on the bus."

While some residents inside the Loop continue to hotly debate massive light rail projects that could potentially bring relief to tens of thousands of mass transit riders, there are others who live just outside the Loop who spend hours commuting and have no relief in sight.


Nothing highlights the ineptitude of Metro's transportation management better than the last quoted paragraph. While Metro is fiddling with an "expanded light rail system" designed to please the wealthy, chattering class, the majority of riders that should make up their customer base are forced to endure marathon rides on routes designed without actual travel patterns in mind. In short, if you're unfortunate enough to need to ride the bus (read: poor) tough luck. Metro's got other priorities. Priorities that look better on glossies sent out to prospective sporting events, conventions etc.


This is why I've long stated that Houston's failure in regard to having a competent mass transportation system aren't the result of so-called "anti-rail" groups, but instead they are signs that Metro has failed miserably at their core mission.


Since the outset I've thought that the Light Rail tram, as designed, was a recipe for transit disaster. As "Metro Solutions" missed promise after promise related to increased bus service, it only became more clear that MetroRail was going to do more to harm mass transportation than help it in the long run. Sure, we're going to have a toy that will move the well-off from their townhomes and flats to the Galleria (sort-of), restaurants, bars and sports stadiums, but when it comes to reducing congestion and getting people from home to work and back again (the two main functions of any good public transportation system) the system will be sorely lacking.

However, after the citizens of Houston voted for MetroSolutions the argument should have been based on securing the best system that provided the best mobility and that wasn't punitive to existing forms of transportation. Unfortunately, the debate was characterized "pro" vs. "anti" rail instead of "pro" vs. "anti" MetroSolutions. The idea being forwarded that if you were against Metro, then you were against good public transportation as a whole.

As time goes on I believe that we are going to see more and more stories of this type. Metro has shown no desire to stop cutting back on bus routes, to re-plan their bus map to meet commuting patterns, or to do anything other than move people from a few, select locations to a few locations where Metro (or their friends) have significant real-estate holdings. That's right, what we have is a taxpayer funded boon for the developers, supported by many of the same people who rail against unchecked development.

Oh, and if you're poor or lower-middle class and are forced to live outside the Loop because of high prices?

Suck.it.up...

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Come hither and let us discuss YOUR racism.

It always amuses me when racism is addressed in a "serious" manner...

(from the Culutural Coach blog via chron.commons)
Radio station KPFT and the Center for the Healing of Racism will host a dialogue called “Toward A More Perfect Union” on Tuesday, August 19 from 7-9 pm at Saint Paul’s United Methodist Church.

The community conversation is the first in a series of scheduled discussions on race and other issues that create divisions.

The program will be in the Fondren Hall at St. Paul’s, located at 5501 Main Street at Binz/Bissonnet, across from the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. Parking is free of charge in two lots across Fannin Street from the Sanctuary. The church is within a block of both Museum District MetroRail stops.


The goals of The Center for Healing of Racism read thusly:
-To create for all people a safe environment in which to explore the issues of racism and its social, motional and spiritual repercussions.
- To recognize racism in its various manifestations, including the most blatant forms of bigotry to its most subtle, unaware and sometimes passive forms.
- To examine attitudes, assumptions, feelings and beliefs about people of color and their cultures and to identify methods by which society has conditioned both whites and people of color with misinformation.
- To assist European Americans to discover how racism has affected their lives, to become sensitized to the experiences of people of color, to unlearn racist patterns, and to empower themselves to interrupt racist remarks and attitudes.
- To provide an accepting and supportive atmosphere for people of color to heal the hurts they have suffered as a result of the oppression of racism.
- To make available educational opportunities for people of all ages to obtain accurate information about the history and rich heritage of people of color.
- To build coalitions and associations with other groups and individuals who share a commitment to racial justice.


Now, I'm not one of those who fall under the "deny, deny, deny" catagory of race relations. As a matter of fact I believe that there still are many Americans who speak about members of "other races" in racist terms.

I also believe that so-called "European Americans" are included in this group.


As are African-Americans, and Hispanic-Americans, and Asian-Americans, and Latin-Americans, and so on and so on.

We could all do more to stop racism and treat others as "human beings" first and foremost.

By all I mean ALL. Each and every one of us.

Here's MY suggested "action points" regarding "racism"...

- I'm going to judge each and every person as an individual.

That's it, end of story. I don't need some center to "heal" me of anything.


If I were you I wouldn't waste my time attending a "racial healing" dialogue that's built on racist principles.


Just sayin'.

Post Edouard linkfest.

With commentary.

$79 Billion Iraqi Budget surplus (Chron.com) - Just put Texas politicians on it and they'll tell you why the "surplus" really isn't.

The Texans and the Rodeo blink (Chron.com) - Maybe McNair figured out that the combination of fielding a losing team AND being seen as the guy who destroyed the Astrodome would put him in the same popularity club as Bud Adams? Two words: Casino gambling.

Mrs. White: The Middle-East is broken beyond repair (Chron.com) - Memo to Mrs. White: The fable involves a FROG and a scorpion, not a FISH. Just sayin.

Obama the energy super hero (WSJ) - Possible names: Pipe-Dream Man, Divorced from Reality Man, Mr. Naive.

The Tax rebate belly flop (WSJ) - Yeah, it didn't work. Neither will a promised HUGE economic spending plan either.

Losing the healing power of Joel.

Oh my goodness...

(from Brian Rogers of the Chron)
A flight attendant who says she lost her faith and suffered a hemorrhoidal flare-up after being assaulted by Victoria Osteen will head to court today seeking a jury to hear her lawsuit against the wife of superstar evangelist Joel Osteen.

Sharon Brown accuses Victoria Osteen, co-pastor of Lakewood Church, of throwing her against an airplane bathroom door and elbowing her in the chest during a confrontation on a Continental Airlines flight to Vail, Colo., on Dec. 19, 2005.

Osteen's attorney and a spokesman for Lakewood Church adamantly deny the allegations.



We've all heard of "hell having no fury" etc. but hemorrhoids? That's some mighty hefty righteous indignation right there.

If at first you don't succeed....

try and try again. That's the Texas CPS motto...

(from Terri Langford of the Chron)
Texas Child Protective Services moved Tuesday to return eight polygamist sect children to foster care, the first such action since the Texas Supreme Court ordered these children and more than 400 others returned to their parents in May.

The six girls and two boys, ages 5 to 17, are in four Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints households that either refuse to condemn underage marriages in writing or are actively involved with the practice, according to CPS affidavits filed in San Angelo.

Asked if the eight children are in danger, Charles Childress, a CPS attorney from Austin who filed the agency's motions, would only say: "That's what the judge is being asked to decide."



Here we go again. By all accounts there is (was, could be?) some pedaphilia taking place at the FLDS "Yearning for Zion" ranch. The problem is that the State initially trampled all over due process in trying to protect the children from it. Maybe now, on this second trip around the bend, they'll figure it out.

One can only hope.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Edouard Extremists

1. WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!!!!

2. REAL MEN DRIVE TO WORK WITHOUT THE LIGHTS ON WHILE DOING 70!!!!!!!!!!!!




Heh.

Monday, August 4, 2008

TX Senate: Cornyn "slips" to double digit lead.

Let's see, the polls are showing you in a large lead, and the last round of fundraising totals gives you a 10-1 lead. So what would you do if you were U.S. Senator John Cornyn?

Focus on moving up in the leadership ranks...

(From R.G. Ratcliffe of the Chron)
With a major financial advantage and a lead in the polls over his Democratic challenger, Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn is running as if his opponent is the national Democratic Party, not state Rep. Rick Noriega of Houston.

Since late last year, Cornyn has avoided directly engaging Noriega as much as possible. Any negative critiques of Noriega and his politics come from Cornyn's campaign manager and campaign spokesman.

"Cornyn sees himself as in two election fights — the one in Texas being the least important," said Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University. "The one up in Washington for advancement within the Senate, I think, he has clearly in mind, as well."

Favored for re-election, Cornyn can look forward to moving up in the Senate Republican leadership next year and perhaps take over as the head of the GOP senators' fundraising arm, the National Republican Senatorial Committee. Cornyn last week donated $250,000 of his re-election money to the committee.


Here's the sad fact for the Noriega camp regarding that $250,000 donation: Even after giving away an amount equal to over 25% of Noriega's total cash in hand, Cornyn STILL has a better than 9-1 advantage.

That's it, lights out, will the last Democrat to leave the campaign party please turn out the lights (you know, for the sake of the environment) and lock the door.


Not that the election is over. There's still a few months to go and, this being politics, you never know what could happen. Still, short of Cornyn doing someting incredibly stupid, this campaign was thrown to back-burner status when Noriega made his remark about the need to not increase American drilling but rely on Iraqi oil and renewables to get us out of the oil crunch. Of course, Noriega's campaign team is catagorizing the interview as a "quip", but he made that same statement three times during the visit, suggesting that it was slightly more than a "one time joke" not meant to be taken seriously.

Regardless of whether or not Noriega was joking, the entire candidacy hasn't been ran in a professional manner from the outset. Mr. Noriega's early, dogged, insistence of being a single-issue candidate didn't bode well for him after the primaries, and he's come off bad in several profiles, most noably the John Spong, Texas Monthly feature where Noriega was alternatively cast as amatuerish:
Alas, what was whispered in those phone calls was a different c word: “chaos.” You had already been through three campaign managers and two chief fund-raisers. You were spending money hand over fist, but your fund-raising efforts had gone belly-up. Then I spent primary day with you, traveling to various Houston polling places, and saw a campaign stalled at the fork between viability and Radnofsky Land. Here we were in your hometown, your political base, and nobody knew where you were going or how to get there. Your driver got lost more than once. We almost ran out of gas. Your advance team sent you to shake voters’ hands over lunch at an empty soul-food kitchen.


...and rude to his wife at the same time:
The first time came as we drove between polling places, when I asked how you had selected these particular spots to greet voters. When Melissa started to answer, you interrupted and asked her to cede the floor to Rowland Garza, your deputy campaign manager and field director.

(snip)

The second time you shushed her was when we were driving to lunch. After the aborted meet and greet at the soul-food kitchen, you decided on a nearby Luby’s. We drove right past it as Melissa pointed out the window at the road we needed to take, and you said you knew how to get there. Five miles later, we turned back around.


Ouch.

How bad has it gotten? Even Noriega's base, the Interleft, has been foregoing their weekly posting about how "Cornyn's toast". It seems that even the truest of true-believers in the Obama "bump" realize that its going to take more than Obamamania to carry Rick Noriega to the Promised Land.

In short, he needs a miracle. (or a huge error by Cornyn.)

A rare example of foresight in Government

Kudos to Lake Jackson...

(From Richard Stewart of the Chron)
When the city of Lake Jackson started fueling garbage trucks and other city vehicles with compressed natural gas eight years ago, it was to lessen air pollution, not save money.

But now the vehicles are filling up on fuel that costs the equivalent of $1.29 a gallon, an unplanned bonanza in a time of high fuel prices.

"When you see our garbage trucks start up, you never see a big plume of black smoke," said City Manager Bill Yenne. "We have the best-smelling garbage trucks around."

At the time, cities all over Harris and surrounding counties were being urged to adopt programs to relieve pollution because the area did not meet federal pollution guidelines.

Compressed natural gas has worked well for Lake Jackson, but not for Houston and some other areas.

Working through the Houston-Galveston Area Council, Lake Jackson got several state and federal grants to help build a natural gas refueling facility and to buy vehicles that use the fuel. The grants offset some of the costs.

Vehicles that run on natural gas create much less pollution than those that run on gasoline or diesel.

"It cost us at first," Yenne said, "but our city council voted to spend the money."

The conversion is starting to pay for itself only now, said Craig Nesbitt, Lake Jackson's public works director.

The city had to spend $250,000 for a facility to compress gas and fill the vehicles. A recent upgrade to the system cost another $200,000.


While its certainly not a big step in the right direction, it is a small step towards moving the transportation fleet off of gasoline, something that I've called for on this blog repeatedly.

If America could move 40% of its transportation fleet off of oil to Natural Gas or (eventually) fuel cells it would do a LOT to alleviate the price of gasoline. Of course, the refueling infrastructure would have to be built but that could easily be handled through a streamlined permitting process and tax credits to the companies who are willing to retrofit their existing filling stations with natural gas pumps.

It's not the solution but it could be a part of the overall solution of decreased energy prices.

Added bonus: Natural gas burns a LOT cleaner than gasoline.

West Texas on the oil boom....

See, we TOLD you we wouldn't piss this one away...

(from Mike Snyder of the Chron)
The lights on the rigs pierce the black West Texas night, illuminating mesquite shrubs and jack rabbits scampering across the flat landscape. The glow sends a reassuring message: Good times have returned to the oil patch.

Pump jacks nod vigorously alongside the highway. Fat royalty checks arrive monthly in the mailboxes of ranchers and other landowners. Teachers and retail clerks abandon their jobs for better-paying work in the oil fields as long-idle wells surge to life.

Yet, the people of Kermit and other Permian Basin towns have learned that petroleum-based prosperity is too fragile to squander in wild exuberance. They're paying off debts and investing in public institutions that will endure beyond the boom-and-bust cycles of the oil business.


As a certified West Texas transplant (Robert E. Lee High School in Midland, class of 1991) its with fondness that I remember the pre and post 80's oil booms that brought prosperity to towns like Midland, complete with big ideas and even bigger promises made by Government and Oil Corporations.

Yup, Midland was a comer in the push to be "World Class", even going so far as to build an Arena/Basketball stadium (Chaparral Center) that was the equal of many major college stadiums, and don't forget Ratliff Stadium a football stadium that University of Houston would die for.

Fortunately for Midland their economy has now diversified to a point that they aren't as reliant on oil and gas production and exploration, but despite their protestations to the contrary, they STILL need a healthy industry to thrive.

Some of the other West Texas cities aren't as lucky. Oil is their lifeblood, without it, they will shrivel up and die.

Hopefully the Texas Congressional delegation remembers this constituencies plight when they cast their votes on energy issues.

So by now you know

....we're getting wet in Houston.

Most probably tonight and well into Tuesday...

(from Jennifer Latson of the Chron)
A storm that appeared as a blip on the Gulf Coast radar late last week could reach hurricane strength before it bears down, possibly on the southeast Texas coast, by Tuesday morning.

Tropical Storm Edouard may intensify into a Category 1 hurricane by the time it makes landfall, meteorologists said.

The fast-building storm leaves residents and emergency officials little time to prepare for the high winds and heavy rainfall.

"Since it's come up so quickly and so close to the coast, it's not going to be like (Hurricane) Dolly where we were watching it for a week," said Chris McKinney, a meteorologist for the National Weather Service. "People need to take it seriously and allow the possibility that it could be a low-end hurricane."



By now you should know the drill...if not here's a reminder:

Stock up on water, ice, non-perishable food, batteries, pet food etc.


Then hunker down and wait it out.

Oh, and as BlogHouston reminds us pop some pocorn and be prepared to be amused by the hysterics of local TV weathermen. (WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!)

heh.

Friday, August 1, 2008

How much does your vote cost?

Obama hopes the price is around $1000.00..give or take....

(from Mike Glover of the AP via Yahoo! News)
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday called for a $1,000 "emergency" rebate to consumers to offset soaring energy costs amid fresh signs of a struggling economy with the nation's unemployment rate climbing to a four-year high.

Obama told a town-hall meeting the rebate would be financed with a windfall profits tax on the oil industry.

"This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a working family over the next four months," Obama said in the crucial swing state of Florida.

Obama had earlier said the rebates should be part of a larger tax relief package. But now he says the slumping economy demands they be put in place immediately.


What a deal! A one-thousand dollar rebate on your electricity bills and you don't have to do a thing but pull the lever for Obama.

Oh, unless you have a 401k that might have oil and gas stocks, then you might not want to because these stocks will lose significant value if the windfall profits tax is passed. Yeah, think you can retire on $1,000?

Oh, and if you're a Senior citizen living on a fixed income whose been enjoying that royalty bump, or that increase in dividend payments well...you better learn to stretch that $1,000 dollars because that increased income will be gone as well.

Oh, and if you happen to be one of the tens of thousands of people who are making good money working in the oil-field because of the exploration boom? Well, some of you better hope that $1,000 is a recurring payment because there are about to be a LOT less jobs in those fields because new taxes are going to make it financially worthless to expand.

But wait: Can't all of the engineers and geo-scientists, and platform workers and logistical support workers get jobs in the "rapidly growing" (and heavily subsidized) alternative energy fields?

Oh, no....that really won't work either.


So, we're going to have less production, less employment, less royalties, less dividends, fewer job opportunities, higher oil and gas prices and more pain at the pump because our votes were sold for $1,000 to a guy who's "well-spoken, articulate, and nice-looking".

Higher prices, less energy and "Big Oil" will just focus their business overseas.

Yup, we're REALLY going to stick it to 'em.

YES WE CAN!!!!!

Texas tops...

in Teen Pregnancies...

(from Jeff McShan of KHOU Channel 11)
For the first time in 15 years, teen pregnancies are on the rise. Experts aren’t sure why.

Some say it’s because pregnancy is considered cool.

This month, OK Magazine featured a story about 17-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears and her new baby.

On the cover, the teen celebrity declared: “Being a mom is the best feeling in the world.”

Others blame a lack of sex education.

“I don’t think it’s good for anybody to have unprotected sex, to have sex really, but not everybody is going to listen,” Calderon said.

Planned Parenthood said Texas leads all states in unintended pregnancies. Sixty-three out of 1,000 girls become pregnant in Texas between the ages of 15 to 19.

The national average is 43 out of every 1,000, which is a higher rate than many other countries.

“They deserve that information, and we know by looking at other countries and looking at that information, young people with the tools can prevent unintended pregnancies,” Planned Parenthood’s Meryl Cohen said.

And clearly, many teens can’t handle the demands of motherhood.


I'm guessing this is one area where Texas would prefer to not be listed in the top 5, much less number one. But, the problem is there so now the question is: "What do we do about it?"

The first step is properly identifying (and quantifying) the problem. An article by Texas Monthly in May 2008 claims Texas isn't first, but fifth. So which is it?

Step One: A reliable count of teen pregnancies NOT ran by Planned Parenthood, who is oft-times (see Houston political dictionary) as much a part of the problem as they are part of the solution. This is an agency who survives on revenues from things like teen pregnancy after all.

But when we quantify it, what then? How do we stop kids from doing things that kids do?

The Republicans have hitched their wagon to abstinence only education. The thought behind this being that if you don't mention teen sex to children, they won't know it exists. The Democrats want educators to tell teens about the wide, wide range of contraceptives out there, teach them and they will use them is the motto.

As is usual, the answer is far more nuanced than just teaching a kid how to squeeze the tip and roll on a condom. There are social, economic and religious factors to consider, as well as the decline of the nuclear family. Any program that's going to make a dent in the teen pregnancy rate has to take all of these factors into consideration, or its doomed to fail.

1. The only 100% for sure way to not get pregnant is to not have sex. This is the undisputed fact that abstinance only backers hang their hat on. It's true, and its probably the best advice, but it shouldn't be the only advice.

2. Condoms and contraceptives greatly reduce the risk of pregnancy, provided they are used correctly. Some also provide a modest amount of protection from STD's, although some are entirely non-effective.

3. Birth control pills are effective, but they come with risks. They also amount to what is basically an open invitation for an STD. Buyer beware. You may not get pregnant but you might get rashes, itching and possibly death or a difficult future life.

That should be the three-pronged sex-education class taught to children in public schools. I'd start teaching this in the 6th grade were I king of Texas.

The other problems are social in nature and may be beyond the scope of the State to directly impact.

The Catholic Church has a long standing dictate against birth control. You can't legislate away a deeply-held religious belief.

In some cultures teen pregnancy is accepted, even encouraged. And no, I'm not singling anyone out. In America girls USED to get married at 13, we've changed and raised the age to 18, that's very old to be getting married according the the norms of some cultures. How do we deal with them?

Important questions are going to be asked of the Lege in the upcoming session regarding teen pregnancy. The overriding question that will determine success will center on whether politicians can leave behind their own social and religious leanings, ignore the blathering of interest groups and sit down to craft meaningful policies designed to curb teen pregnancy. Only by arming the State Board of Education, local school districts and teachers with a variety of weapons will the efforts bear any fruit.

About those "record oil profits"

By now you've seen the news, heard the announcements and watched the politicians whip themselves into a lather right?

If not, here's a little more from Kristen Hays of the Chron:
Exxon Mobil Corp. jumped into the political fray Thursday as its $11.7 billion record quarterly earnings — and $8 billion in share buybacks — raised hackles in Washington.

"They tell us they want to do more domestic production," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "They tell us they need to drill offshore. They tell us that they can find oil on the mainland. And what do they do with their profits? They buy back stock, simply to increase their share price."

Ken Cohen, the company's vice president of public affairs, repeatedly told reporters the company would increase domestic production if Congress would lift its ban on drilling in areas that have been off-limits for more than 25 years.

"We want to do more," Cohen said. "Congress needs to give us access."

Democrats argue that producers already hold 68 million acres of federal lands on which they are not producing oil or gas.

Irving-based Exxon Mobil, the world's largest oil company, was the fourth major oil giant to release quarterly results. Hours earlier, Royal Dutch Shell, based in the Netherlands, announced a 33 percent increase in profit. Houston-based ConocoPhillips last week announced a 13 percent increase in net income during a quarter in which oil prices rose from about $100 to $140 a barrel. London-based BP announced a 28 percent profit increase on Tuesday.


Blah, Blah, Blah.

What Schumer and team are ignoring is the fact that Exxon's capital expenditure budget has INCREASED by 43% over previous year's numbers.

Per The Daily Green:

Exxon Mobil will spend as much as $30 billion on capital and exploration projects annually between 2008 and 2012, up 43% from its 2007 budget, according to the Toronto Star.

That $210 billion investment dwarfs the spending of the U.S. government on renewable and clean energy projects, and would outspend – by far – even the ambitious and revolutionary energy policies proposed by Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.


On top of all that...

(from Steve Hargraves of CNN Money)
In addition to making hefty profits, Exxon also had a hefty tax bill. Worldwide, the company paid $10.5 billion in income taxes in the second quarter, $9.5 billion in sales taxes, and over $12 billion in what it called "other taxes."


For those of you bad at math (or not willing to accept the numbers due to political prejudice) Exxon's tax bill for the 2nd Quarter came to $32 Billion dollars.

You don't hear Schumer and Friends carping about the Government "giving" that money back to the "people" do you?

Nope, they want to take MORE:
Several bills have been introduced in Congress to enact a "windfall" profits tax on these earnings, or at the very least eliminate manufacturing tax exemption oil companies now enjoy. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama wants to tax oil companies at a special rate every time crude goes over $80 a barrel.

Most plans would either use this newfound tax money to fund investments in renewable energy, or give it to low income Americans struggling with high energy prices.


Of course, a portion of this tax money is already going to renewable research (around $2 Billion in 2008)and Democrats are screaming for more money to give to their political donors, something they chastised the Republicans for doing with Big Oil.

Still, if anything has to be done I'd as soon have the oil manufacturing subsidy eliminated, except for the "green" initiatives that push refiners toward cleaner technologies. While we're at it let's cut the Government's share as well, since all they are doing is funnelling the money into an identical wealth transfer system to the one they are putting heat on the Republicans for, just the names at the tops of the mastheads are different.

What needs to stop now is Schumer & Co. blathering on about "obscene profits" while the entity that's REALLY making out like a bandit is the Federal Government.

A Government whose decided that 50% of profits is not enough. They've got to have more to buy more votes and enrich more political donors. And the proletariat cheers them for it thinking that some of the largesse is going to be redirected to them.


One last thing: Oil prices fell again this week. Still high, but getting better.