It all started with a nice catch by Kevin Whited at BlogHouston while looking over some campaign finance disclosures. The local blogosphere piled on.
Interestingly, Uncle Darrell pointed out that most credible news sources forbid political contributions by their reporters and editorial writers. Apparently the Chronicle has no such qualms. (Or doesn't feel that contributions are unethical from editorialists)
Now, a commenter at BlogHouston points out this little tidbit:
[Orlando Cepeda {A pseudonym we're sure}, BlogHouston Forums]
Now HERE is an interesting development. This editorial, written by Ms. Georgsson, is prominently displayed on Mincberg's Web site. Coincidentally (or more likely, NOT), it was written one week to the day after Ms. Georgsson forked over her cash to Mr. Mincberg at his fundraiser party.
So not only does she donate $250 in cold hard cash, but she follows it up a week later with a nice little anti-GOP, anti-Emmett editorial for Mincberg to display prominently on his Web site.
That's cozy. And I guess it's the kind of fine journalism we can expect come endrosement time too, I suspect.
Under a cloud
Sept. 5, 2008, 8:37PM
The series of ethics questions bedeviling Harris County elected officials, which began with the forced resignation of District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal, shows no signs of letting up as a pivotal election approaches.
Sheriff Tommy Thomas has been the target of reports concerning questionable e-mail deletion policies by his staff and work by county contractors on his private property. Now County Commissioner Jerry Eversole, who has been embroiled in periodic controversies over his campaign fund spending habits since he was elected 17 years ago, tells the Chronicle’s Liz Austin Peterson that he is the focus of an FBI corruption probe and expects to be forced from office.
While proclaiming his innocence, Eversole acknowledged that FBI agents had interviewed his friends and the government could “make a case on me. That’s why I say my days are numbered. There’s no doubt about it.”
Several months ago, the commissioner stormed out of a court session after an in-house report suggested he and other officials had approved lease-purchase contracts with two now-indicted developers, contracts that might have cost taxpayers millions of dollars.
Eversole was also angered by a KTRK-TV report that focused on his use of campaign funds to buy firearms and pay for a Florida vacation for himself, spouse and friends. The Harris County district attorney’s office continues to probe those expenditures.
At this point Commissioner Eversole enjoys the presumption of innocence. But given his chronic blindness to the ethical requirements of his office, Eversole’s departure would be appropriate.
County Judge Ed Emmett was appointed by Commissioner’s Court to fill out the term of Robert Eckels, who quit to go into private law practice. Emmett, a Republican, appointed a citizen task force that has come up with recommendations to enhance public scrutiny of county officials. His Democratic opponent, David Mincberg, has made an issue of the large contributions that flow to county officials from interests that do business with the county. Mincberg pointed out more than $150,000 in donations that Emmett’s campaign has received from county contractors this year.
The latest developments all but guarantee that good government issues will dominate hard-fought contests for county judge, county attorney, district attorney and sheriff to be decided in November.
It would be refreshing if rather than just talking ethics at election time, the winners would back meaningful reforms once they take office.
The article on the Mincberg site can be found here dated Sept 5, 2008. The article @ Chron.com (now archived) can be found here.
Ms. Georgsson's contribution can be found on pg 18 here dated 08/29/2008.
It should be noted that, due to the Chronicle's policy of publishing editorials unsigned, there is no way to conclusively identify Ms. Georgsson as the sole author of that editorial. However, her position on the Chronicle Editorial Board certainly raises sufficient doubt as to whether or not she had input into the content and process. Since we are nearing a major election, its also fair to question the impartiality and judgement of the entirety of the Editorial Board based on this information, especially in matter of County politics.
At a minimum, based on the reading of journalism ethics provided by Unca Darrell, there's conduct that violates established codes that's going unaddressed down at 801 Texas Ave. The worst case scenario is that the Chronicle editorial board is violating the trust placed in it by its subscriber base by failing to publically recuse Ms. Georgsson from the endorsement and editorial process until after the election.
Where this falls on the spectrum I'll leave for you to decide.

4 comments:
"Mincberg has made an issue of the large contributions that flow to county officials from interests that do business with the county."
Wow, the unmitigated GALL and condescension that is required to write that sentence about Mincberg when you know that you and he are cosnpiring to hide EXACTLY that same information from your readers. I used to think she should have to abstain from voting on any political issues in the future. I now think she should be fired. She INTENTIONALLY hid this information, knowing that it was unethical, but continued to lambast every Republican she could lay her "bought and paid for" hands on. She and Mincberg are two peas in a pod.
HUGE black eye, Chronicle. You owe us readers an explanation.
Calm down there cowboy, we ARE only speaking of $250 now.
You're correct in demanding an explanation from the Chron however. They have a lot to answer for in this situation.
So the ethics being questioned here are dependent entirely on the amount of cash involved?
I don't think so.
I think we have Ms. Georgsson condemning secrecy and influence buying in her editorial while engaging in EXACTLY those two things by donating to Mincberg's campaign. I'd venture to say that $250 is a larger percentage of her annual income than are the $1,000 or $2,000 contributions she condemns from architects or roadbuilders.
Ethics to me are not relative. And as I used to teach my children, you know in your heart that you have done wrong if you go out of your way to hide it from the rest of us.
No, no, no. My point is that Mincberg has done nothing wrong here. All he did was accept a donation and properly disclose it.
Georgsson and the Chron however have some 'splaining to do. Especially when you consider they go out of their way to categorize the Ed Board as "neither right nor left".
Your comment grouping Mincberg's charges about corruption with Georgsson's donation are different matters.
They are not "two peas in a pod" in this situation as you are claiming.
Post a Comment